https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25445
--- Comment #3 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com> --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #0) > 0: 66 63 08 movslq (%rax),%cx Looks correct to me. (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > Also > > 63 08 movslq (%rax),%ecx This too looks correct to me. The only anomaly I can think of because of the vendor difference would be a memory operand in Intel syntax mode, which - if tagged by an operand size - might want to be WORD PTR for the 16-bit case in Intel64 mode and DWORD PTR in the AMD64 one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
