Re: [PRQ#71006] Deletion Request for cammus-ff-dkms

2025-03-12 Thread Muflone Ovinis
se again the cammus-ff-dkms package deletion request. Feel free to re-submit the deletion request whenever the module is not working anymore for the linux and linux-lts packages. Best regards -- Muflone

Re: [PRQ#71006] Deletion Request for cammus-ff-dkms

2025-03-12 Thread Muflone Ovinis
on the package page https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/cammus-ff-dkms about issues, I can still build the module, install and load it What are the issues with this package? Best regards Muflone

Re: [PRQ#65060] Orphan Request for tpi Rejected

2024-11-09 Thread Muflone
Request #65060 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: the package was updated [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ Repeating myself from 10/05 The pkgbuild have bumped version but now is a disguised -bin one I have posted a revisioned pkgbuild on 2024-10-29 which have not been followed

Re: [PRQ#64202] Orphan Request for zfs-linux Rejected

2024-10-12 Thread Muflone
wait at least 8 days before the requests can be approved but I still am not convinced to approve them after the needed time to await. As long the project is not forked or maintained again, why do you want to orphan these packages? Regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#62275] Deletion Request for ume-git Accepted

2024-08-26 Thread Muflone
g the ume-git repository by making a new git push. On 2024-08-24 14:37, not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: Request #62275 has been Accepted by Muflone [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for ume-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ As you already submitted again the same pa

Re: [PRQ#61060] Orphan Request for tachidesk

2024-07-06 Thread Muflone
x.org/pkgbase/tachidesk/ Is there some specific issue with this package? Your request only refers your desire to maintain it but this doesn't seem enough to me to make the package orphan. It currently builds fine. Let me know before refusing your request Thanks -- Muflone

Re: [PRQ#60795] Deletion Request for hath Rejected

2024-06-09 Thread Muflone
Hi Anankke Hi Muflone, Both of them are outdated. The new version is 1.6.3, and none of them are updated. If you want to maintain the hath package you can file an orphan request and get the package in order to fix it. Among the two existing packages, hentaiathome is outdated, orphan

Re: [PRQ#60669] Orphan Request for winff

2024-06-02 Thread Muflone
xiota. Also FabioLolix sent you a patched PKGBUILD for a splitted package providing both qt and gtk2 versions. Regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#59191] Deletion Request for widevine Rejected

2024-06-01 Thread Muflone
reate duplicated packages. Instead collaborate with the existing packages' maintainers and eventually add extra architectures, if the software supports them. This ARM discussion is entirely out of this package topic. Regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#59191] Deletion Request for widevine Rejected

2024-06-01 Thread Muflone
any reasons to keep this package. The package will be removed in the next days. Regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#59191] Deletion Request for widevine Rejected

2024-05-12 Thread Muflone
thers browsers? This wouldn't result in a duplicate package, a more simpler maintenance  and also better a more specific task for the package. All the rest seems not an interesting argument against the package deletion. Regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#59768] Deletion Request for angie-owasp-crs

2024-05-04 Thread Muflone
ly provides the same thing with only minor packaging changes. Best regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#59768] Deletion Request for angie-owasp-crs

2024-05-01 Thread Muflone
-owasp-crs? Thank you -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#59191] Deletion Request for widevine Rejected

2024-04-29 Thread Muflone
Hello Request #59191 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: see previous package maintainer answer [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ @Muflone, what do you mean exactly? The package is not buildable and installable on Arch Linux due to missing a dependency, 'glibc-widevine&#

Re: [PRQ#59772] Deletion Request for widevine

2024-04-29 Thread Muflone
tus). Regards [1] https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/thread/IAHLWRGRNHHUZRU2LRMX5UTZUNGJBAUO/ -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#59191] Deletion Request for widevine Rejected

2024-04-28 Thread Muflone
Request #59191 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: see previous package maintainer answer [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ @Muflone, what do you mean exactly? The package is not buildable and installable on Arch Linux due to missing a dependency, 'glibc-widevine'. T

Re: [PRQ#59513] Merge Request for python-tts Rejected

2024-04-27 Thread Muflone
Hola Il 27/04/24 17:52, Marcell Meszaros ha scritto: On 27 April 2024 17:12:43 GMT+02:00,not...@aur.archlinux.org wrote: Request #59513 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: coqui-ai/tts is a TTS library for Python so the package python-tts is the best suited for this software, regardless the

Re: [PRQ#54087] Deletion Request for mplayer2-build-git Accepted

2024-04-15 Thread Muflone
d it after you fix it. However I'm not convinced what is this for. -- Muflone

Re: [PRQ#53190] Deletion Request for linux-api-headers-git Rejected

2024-04-14 Thread Muflone
Hi Request #53190 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: the package was updated [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/ Does not make the package legitimate, still an unneeded duplicate. See refiled PRQ#59168. The package maintainer intention was to create a VCS package but he added

Re: [PRQ#58633] Orphan Request for android-file-transfer-linux-git

2024-04-14 Thread Muflone
weren't important issues, recent complains, or OOD flag; no reasons for warranting an orphan request I'm sorry but it's too late. Your request was already accepted when I was able to read your reply. -- Muflone

Re: [PRQ#52543] Deletion Request for newsqueak

2024-04-13 Thread Muflone
from 2000 segfaults during basic usage. The package was updated and git history was rewritten. -- Muflone

Re: [PRQ#50396] Deletion Request for petsc-free+opts Accepted

2024-04-06 Thread Muflone
gver variable used in the makedepends is not valid and produces errors in the case hypre was not previously prebuilt 6) the whole PKGBUILD was very chaotic, with a lot of commented lines, disabled code, empty arrays, confused instructions Regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#58283] Orphan Request for stm32cubeprog Rejected

2024-03-31 Thread Muflone
Request #58283 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: the package was updated by the requester I've just realized maybe your request was to become the maintainer by requesting the orphan, not to abandon the package. In such case, sorry, I misunderstood your request, please send a new o

Re: [PRQ#58283] Orphan Request for stm32cubeprog Rejected

2024-03-31 Thread Muflone
Request #58283 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: the package was updated by the requester I've just realized maybe your request was to become the maintainer by requesting the orphan, not to abandon the package. In such case, sorry, I misunderstood your request, please send a new o

Re: [PRQ#57765] Deletion Request for owncloud-app-music-git

2024-03-30 Thread Muflone
can simply clone it from AUR, upgrade and restore it. I'm temporarily denying the deletion request in the case you're still interested in maintaining it along with owncloud, otherwise it will be deleted for the missing owncloud dependency. Best regards -- Muflone

Re: [PRQ#58232] Deletion Request for grok

2024-03-23 Thread Muflone
ero benefits as you ignored most of the issues about your packages. Best regards -- Muflone

Re: [PRQ#49113] Merge Request for wxlauncher Rejected

2024-03-18 Thread Muflone
Il 19/03/24 00:39, Marcell Meszaros ha scritto: Request #49113 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: as long it works there's no point in deleting it But as was stated by maintainer and myself, the stable package doesn't work, only the -git one. I think I misunderstood the ma

Re: [PRQ#49049] Deletion Request for auto-cpufreq-no-gnome-power Rejected

2024-03-18 Thread Muflone
Il 19/03/24 00:19, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: Request #49049 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: invalid request sorry, I misunderstood the request meaning. Requesting a new delete request as the package as auto-cpufreq is available -- Muflone

Re: [PRQ#50993] Deletion Request for libsidplay Rejected

2024-03-09 Thread Muflone
-- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#48514] Deletion Request for mailx-git Rejected

2024-03-02 Thread Muflone
orry for the errors but English is not my language) -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#48514] Deletion Request for mailx-git Rejected

2024-02-26 Thread Muflone
duct [2] Best regards [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=newsqueak&id=6cc244be051f099964a77710f7cc9e05d93bc952 [2] https://terms.archlinux.org/docs/code-of-conduct/ -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#47769] Deletion Request for cmarked Rejected

2024-02-26 Thread Muflone
Hi The way I am submitting cascading deletion requests are carefully considered. Deleting cmarked would allow deleting the nowhere else needed python-pyside and (python-)shiboken. python-pyside has gone to the heaven -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#48539] Deletion Request for cura-5-modern-beta-bin Rejected

2024-02-26 Thread Muflone
plicate of cura-bin and should itself be deleted. My response was a wrong copy-paste for cura-5-plugin-octoprint request, sorry, I didn't mean to answer this request Regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#47769] Deletion Request for cmarked Rejected

2024-02-26 Thread Muflone
de package. The python-pyside issues don't directly reflect this package breakage. Make sure to provide correct and meaningful information in the deletion requests, not indirect reasons not related to the package itself. Best regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#48514] Deletion Request for mailx-git Rejected

2024-02-26 Thread Muflone
Request #48514 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: until this is broken, there's no reason to delete it. not providing mailx is not a valid reason to delete it @Muflone, didn't you read my followup message? No, what made you think I read the messages? I only press random butt

Re: [PRQ#47162] Deletion Request for pypy-lxml Rejected

2024-02-10 Thread Muflone
Hi Marcell the pypy-lxml package was dropped and actually there're no reasons to free the pypy-lxml name Muflone, I disagree on the last point. There are some people, e.g. those who work in science and Academia, who might benefit from being able to use PyPy for Python2 from AUR.

Re: [PRQ#47182] Deletion Request for libressl-netcat Rejected

2024-02-10 Thread Muflone
Hi Marcell I cannot get the reasons to delete this package. extra/openbsd-netcat uses the debian version of netcat while this package uses the openbsd source. So why you want to remove it? Muflone, because the netcat source code coming from Debian's repo is a mirror of the OpenBSD ve

Re: [PRQ#49829] Orphan Request for nemo-git Rejected

2023-12-03 Thread Muflone
Il 03/12/23 21:58, Mark Wagie ha scritto: No, nothing has changed with Nemo since 2018. Obviously the package still works /s Request #49829 has been Rejected by muflone [1]: not a single comment explaining the package issues or reasons to make this package orphan The orphan

Re: [PRQ#49734] Orphan Request for glaxnimate-git Rejected

2023-11-06 Thread Muflone
ssues present in this. @Muflone, I think this package should either be orphaned in the hope that someone adopts it before the next automated CI bump, or @mattbas bot user should also be restricted/banned. @Marcell I already asked mattbas to stop auto-bumping the version [1] If he insists on doi

Re: [PRQ#49031] Deletion Request for android-sdk-dummy

2023-10-15 Thread Muflone
@lists.archlinux.org/message/PUJVRPFDTXSVYTV6QPQ7A5SVJF5GZM2U/ -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#49030] Deletion Request for android-sdk-platform-tools-dummy

2023-10-15 Thread Muflone
@lists.archlinux.org/message/PUJVRPFDTXSVYTV6QPQ7A5SVJF5GZM2U/ -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#49028] Deletion Request for android-platform-dummy

2023-10-15 Thread Muflone
7;s opinion Best regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#46940] Deletion Request for motivewave-latest-bin

2023-09-03 Thread Muflone
eriod. it will be deleted in the next hours. the motivewave package is actually up-to-date and it builds fine there's no point in having a package which fetches the latest version which is equal to the latest fixed version Best regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#42399] Deletion Request for avogadro2

2023-07-23 Thread Muflone
sk for a merge in a new package. So please, don't force us to take actions and try to collaborate together thank you -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#43953] Deletion Request for python2-feedgen Rejected

2023-07-09 Thread Muflone
pdate. Best regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [PRQ#41006] Orphan Request for smartgit

2023-05-01 Thread Muflone
aintaining it please let me know, and I'll cancel the orphan request [2] filed 2 weeks ago Best regards [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/smartgit [2] https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/thread/SJ3S57QY4R4Z4THYQOVJCIWVGQP2VYBO -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#36747] Deletion Request for caffe2 Rejected

2022-08-09 Thread Muflone via aur-requests
those seem to be -git repositories I am sorry but the reason for rejection seems nonsense to me. Could you please kindly explain it, @muflone? Thank you in advance, and for doing all this valuable work here in Arch and AUR. ops my mistake. there were two identical and following requests

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#36497] Orphan Request for go-scc-git Rejected

2022-08-09 Thread Muflone via aur-requests
from AUR, his last login was more than 3 months ago. Please behave well and collaborate with existing maintainers. best regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#36757] Deletion Request for awx Accepted

2022-08-07 Thread Muflone via aur-requests
Il 07/08/22 17:32, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: Request #36757 has been Accepted by muflone [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for awx. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/ package restored after deletion #36757 sorry for the noise, I wasn't aware about th

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#32175] Deletion Request for dot-tools Accepted

2022-02-22 Thread Muflone via aur-requests
sonal dot files collection, not a tool to manage your dot files. The rest of the script are simple oneline bash scripts which calls git commands Best regards -- Fabio Castelli aka Muflone