Dear Pellegrino
dead on arrival for broken dependencies, the package wasn't even
tested before being published.
it was notified to the maintainer but he prefers to broadcast his
twitter/X and publish links on AUR than fixing the package
The devices on which the packaging of the software is conduct are
experimental.
Your packaging system is irrelevant about the AUR.
Every package **MUST** respect the Arch Linux packaging standards.
If your setup is broken or not it's pretty irrelevant.
The AUR is not your place where to cast your daily experiments, the AUR
is a place where other people get build instructions for packages for
Arch Linux and people expect to find working packages, otherwise such
package will be deleted.
I wrote the following message on the mediascan package and I'll copy
also here to make sure you don't miss by any chance:
Would you please stop publishing broken on arrival packages?
Would you please open the package page
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mediascan and read the RED
dependencies? Those are broken and need to be fixed.
Would you please test your packages BEFORE submitting them on the AUR
without awaiting other people to point to all the tens of errors they
contain?
Please don't make me repeat for the third time to test your packages
BEFORE submitting to the AUR.
pkgctl build
namcap *.zst
namcap PKGBUILD
Also:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Creating_packages
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_package_guidelines
Please observe those hints and **don't publish anything else** before
having checked those requirements are met.
Consider this one as my last attempt to explain you what you're doing
wrong and it's causing a lot of work and waste of time with zero
benefits as you ignored most of the issues about your packages.
Best regards
--
Muflone
