Il 29/04/24 20:09, not...@aur.archlinux.org ha scritto:
MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for widevine [2]:
Re-filing a deletion request due to not receiving any response [a] as
to the rationale to keep this duplicate of the properly packaged
AUR/chromium-widevine. [b]
Marcell, please stop this passive/aggressive attitude immediately.
Consider this message as a first formal warning.
I replied to your request yesterday at 6.48 PM, after that you replied
again at 7.31 PM.
24 hours later you wrote a new request about not having received any
response from me.
Multiple requests won't solve anything, apart burdening the PMs to
manage them and make them angry for your behavior.
Also you don't communicate with the packages' maintainer using deletion
requests: first contact them and explain your opinion, awaiting also
their response.
The widevine maintainer explained the package can offer more than
chromium-widevine [1]
Whether this is real or false is a matter to evaluate, not from your
side only, you simply don't file a new request after 24 hours I rejected
your request (which contained two false statements about the package
status).
Regards
[1]
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/thread/IAHLWRGRNHHUZRU2LRMX5UTZUNGJBAUO/
--
Fabio Castelli aka Muflone
