On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:22:40 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> As I said, Dieter will be the most competent to help here
You and Gerhard said it all.
I only want to add: even though the manual/workaround-method that Thomas
explained may work (the mountpoints are prefixed by '/mnt' btw, so '/mnt/bo
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:15:20 +0200
RedShift wrote:
> David C. Rankin wrote:
> > Has anyone else noticed fan speed increases
> > on your NV cards here lately? If so, any solutions??
>
> I suggest you take it up with nvidia, as only they have access to the
> source code. Nothing much we can do abou
hey dudes.
I fail (sort of) at pairing my pc with my phone via bluetooth.
(sony ericsson k810i, pc uses broadcom dongle)
I have a system where everything is up to date, bluez is installed etc.
the configs are all pretty much default.
I did need to enable HID2HCI_ENABLE="true" in /etc/conf.d/blueto
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:19:57 +0200
vlad wrote:
> hello dieter,
>
> try phonetooth from AUR. works great with my 610i.
>
>
Thanks for the idea. But i'm trying to avoid any additional apps.
I mean, it _should_ work with bluez-simple-agent.
and obexfs kicks the ass of any tool such as phoneto
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:56:13 +0200
Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 17:45 +1000, richard terry wrote:
> > /etc/arch-release
> >
> > Anyone know what is meant to be in this file
> >
> > The guys on the gambas user list are writing some sort of script so
> > users can identify details
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:12:53 +1000
richard terry wrote:
> Thanks for the replies, me I didn't mean anything, they just asked me
> what was in the file.
>
> pacman -Q obviously not the answer, but whilst on that - is it
> possible to do a pacman -Q, save the output somewhere, then on
> another
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:45:33 +0200
Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:40 +0200, Gerhard Brauer wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 26.08.2009, 09:56 +0200 schrieb Jan de Groot:
> >
> > > As Arch is a rolling release system, we decided to remove the
> > > file. But as tools use this file to i
Hi, I have a little server at home which has an encrypted disk mounted at
/home/media/1tbdisk
I added it to crypttab and the decrypted dm device to fstab, but i have the
following problems:
1) the keymap upon luksOpen is qwerty, even though i have my keymap set in
rc.conf and added 'keymap'
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:35:12 +0800
goodme...@gmail.com wrote:
> Is it possible?
>
> advantage:
>1 The mirrors do not need download the total new pkgs if it just
> updated several files.
rsync does this too
>2 old versions of package can be retrived.
YAGNI
>3 GIT is fast.
r
According to
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009 16:40:40 +0200
"Ali H. Caliskan" wrote:
man bash
> Bash can handle array of arrays, dependening on how you implement it. I'm
> not that useful in that manner, since I've applied on python.
>
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Daenyth Blank
>
> > wrote:
>
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:20:42 +0200
Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
> You shouldn't [want to] create one from the installation media
> at this time, since it's not sane to install anything on it unless
> you are a btrfs developer/tester (in which case you are also capable
> enough to work around this ;
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 16:30:00 -0600
Keith Hinton wrote:
> Hi,
> As one of Chris Branon's friends, and as one who has submitted
> valuable feedback, I'd like to see Chrisses CD get more support from
> the Arch team leads, etc.
I'ld like that too. The reason I didn't do much here is pure lack of tim
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:45:21 +0200
Johannes Held wrote:
> Chris Bannister :
> > Proabbly initab is set wrong, what was updated?
> That can be. I don't know what's been updated. That update was one or two
> weeks
> ago. Unfortunately I don't know exactly what packages are updated - but I bet
> it
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:06:41 +0300
"Ciprian Dorin, Craciun" wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Tom K wrote:
> > Why are you using 2009.02? 2009.08 was released last month.
> >
> > T.
>
> Sorry. I'm using 2009.08.
>
> But when I've posted on the mailing list I've looked on
> www
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:00:48 +0200
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> > Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > > If someone has a chance, can you release this live?
> >
> > done
>
> Well, some links are wrong;
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:37:09 -0500
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:00:48 +0200
> > Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> >
> >> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
It would be nice if it was easily possible to compare a pkgbuild
against a corresponding 'official' pkgbuild (from ABS).
disclaimer: i haven't thought this through so here are some ideas.
consider this a brainstorm
- on AUR, many packages are customized versions (patches, vcs versions,
alternat
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 12:16:04 -0500
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> So in the next few weeks, I would like to buy a netbook. The market is
> saturated, so I'd like to ask for some advice here.
>
> What do you guys think of the current offerings? What's considered
> "the best" now-a-days? What kinds of net
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:47:24 +0300
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
> 2009/10/2 Sergej Pupykin :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to discuss using /srv directory in packages
> >
> > (For reference: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16410)
> >
> > Of course I can easy sed and rebuild all my web packages, but I
> > want to
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:58:19 +0200
Firmicus wrote:
> Roman Kyrylych a écrit :
> > Yes, packaging a webapp is nice for automatic upgrading with pacman,
> > but users can have multiple web servers with multiple vhosts
> > in /srv, so often installing something there won't make it working
> > anyway
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:11:00 +0200
Øyvind Heggstad wrote:
> So you have to use 'hjkl' and so on. (which you should use anyway)
only on crappy (or 'suboptimal' for the political correct) keyboard
layouts.
Dieter
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:33:12 +0100
Arvid Picciani wrote:
> hollun...@gmx.at wrote:
>
> > The problem is that the Desktop Environments, GNOME and KDE, in
> > their quest for "integrated desktop experience" push more and more
> > stuff that's really only useful to those DEs deeper and deeper into
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:08:00 +0100
wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:52:28 -0500
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
> > > But honestly, I can see the mess, and from what I know I'd say the
> > > problem stems from alsa being too difficult to use. The alsa
> > > developers hide (from a bombardment of user q
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 20:19:46 +
Magnus Therning wrote:
> On 01/11/09 15:06, Karol Babioch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm wondering whether there is a possibility to encrypt a remote
> > system using Arch Linux? I have installed Arch on a remote server,
> > and don't like the idea that anyone with
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:18:53 +0100
Xavier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Tobias Powalowski
> wrote:
> > Before using vesa driver you should at least give nouveau and nv
> > driver a shot.
> > Both lack on 3D support but for 2D operations they should work fine.
> > Nouveau has nice kms s
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:31:20 -0600
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Listmates,
>
> New drive for my laptop so I dedicated it to Arch. Net install with
> 2009.08 went fine (although there really should be a warning when you
> leave install WITHOUT configuring the bootloader). [the /arch/setup
> menu aut
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 07:17:38 -0600
Dan McGee wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:04 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:31:20 -0600
> > "David C. Rankin" wrote:
> >
> >> Listmates,
> >>
> >> New drive for my laptop
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:42:43 -0600
Chris Brannon wrote:
> Daenyth Blank wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 16:16, Chris Brannon
> > wrote:
> > > Is there any way to access bugs.archlinux.org programmatically?
> > > =C2=A0I'd=
> > love
> > > to be able to manipulate it from the shell.
>
> > Coul
On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:18:12 +0100
Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> You will probably see the
> opposite of what you saw in the VMs. Especially for video encoding,
> x86_64 will be noticeably faster.
why is that?
Hi,
according to
http://www.kdenlive.org/user-manual/troubleshooting-and-common-problems/troubleshooting-firewire-capture
we are using an old firewire stack.
I'm having big problems with DV-video (firewire) stuff ( see
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=655692 ) and I was wondering
if the n
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:01:31 -0800
Myles Green wrote:
> I've been using Claws-Mail [1] since forever and have been happily
> using it with Gmail as well as my ISP account.
>
> [1] http://claws-mail.org/
claws is cool indeed. i like the ability to view html mail (for
newsletters and such). i j
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:46:15 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> claws is cool indeed. i like the ability to view html mail (for
> newsletters and such). i just hoped it was more configurable
> (e.g. per-account keybindings so i could have single-key keybindings
> to delete mails wh
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:38:18 +0100
Arvid Picciani wrote:
> webkit based browsers can't render half of the
> internet properly. i wonder if somone cloned chromiums webkit thing
> and made a brwoser of it? uzbl is quite decent, i wish they'd use
> chromes rendering.
can you give some examples o
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:05:11 -0800
Tobias Kieslich wrote:
> Don't jump to conclusions here. Inspecting the headers (..)
yes this a known issue. libsoup doesn't support compression, and some
sites send out gzipped content when they shouldn't.
So lxde.org and others cannot be used on webkitGtk bas
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:30:47 -0200
"Armando M. Baratti" wrote:
> Strange, Midori (webkit based) works fine with http://www.lxde.org/
> here. Are you talking about some specific part of the site?
> Or Midori has something other webkit based browsers don't?
>
> Using libsoup 2.28.1-1.
>
>
> Arma
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 20:32:46 +
Pierre Chapuis wrote:
> There is indeed a D-Bus protocol [1], and I don't see why anybody
> would be against that, because a protocol is a written document and
> not a piece of software: it doesn't enforce an implementation.
>
protocols can be bloated and or b
is it just me or did the lastsync format change?
IIRC the lastsync file was 1 file in the root of the repo, with the
date in it in string format.
now the lastsync files are like so:
/{core,extra,testing,...}/os/{i686,x86_64}/lastsync
each containing a unix timestamp.
note: no lastsyncfile for any
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 22:29:03 +1100
"James Rayner" wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:40 +0200, "Hussam Al-Tayeb"
> wrote:
> > The current case for many packages that use optdepends is as
> > follows. Let's say a package called package1 installs some extra
> > binaries or plugins. Those extra not so
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:49:15 -0600
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> The article reads:
>
>
> Nevertheless, as a method of testing this exciting
> distro, the "Archiso-live way" is a great time-saver.
>
did that guy actually say that point and click visual installers are a
time *saver* ?? is he out
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:33:22 -0500
Denis Kobozev wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > did that guy actually say that point and click visual installers
> > are a time *saver* ?? is he out of his mind?
>
> It seems that most reviews
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 12:40:03 -0700
Brendan Long wrote:
> Isn't the Arch installer always graphical, with a menu and stuff?
> Just because you use your keyboard instead of a mouse and it doesn't
> use X doesn't really make it any less user-friendly does it?
no. it can also do fully automated ins
1)
> This begs the question: does arch really want users who can't get
> through the current installer? Isn't the user base Arch Linux is
> catering to one that /should/ understand this?
definitely. in fact, i think our current interactive installer is
already too complicated/userfriendly.
there
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:58:54 -0500
Denis Kobozev wrote:
> Dieter, is it possible to resize existing partitions via PARTITIONS
> variable in the config file?
don't think so. it's meant to make new ones.
> What kind of error do you get if you put
> incorrect values there?
You'll get an error th
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:43:17 +0100
Frédéric Perrin wrote:
> You've never installed Debian/Ubuntu with a preseed.cfg file that
> answer all the questions for you (or, at your option, as many or as
> few questions as you wish)? You've never used FAI (Fully Automated
> Installed) either? (Well, I ha
I have this problem for already about a year. hope someone can help me.
See http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=79513 for detailed
problem description.
thanks.
Dieter
maybe the tux webserver?
it runs in kernelspace (!) so it's very fast, but if it crashes...
Dieter
Hi,
I'm glad the .32 kernel comes with the new firewire stack, so i can
finally use dvgrab (http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=79856)
well.. that's what i thought.
this kernel does not recognize my pci firewire card with the via vt6306
chipset.
(running all latest packages from core, not te
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:22:30 -0500
Carlos Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Alexander Duscheleit
> wrote:
> > I still think /arch/setup *should* generate this file itself if it
> > detects software raids in use for the target. The wiki even seems to
> > suggest, that it does.
>
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:07:18 +0100
Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
> Would it be possible to just generate the relevant mdadm.conf during
> the configure stage without providing further additional support?
> People are used to run installation steps in sequence so this would
> eliminate on source of
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:51:32 +0100
Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
> (..)
okay so long story short, you only want the mdadm.conf updating in AIF.
there's a catch about your proposal though:
- it's hard to parse fstab
- you would only know the blockdevices after user configured fstab,
which is afte
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100
Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> The only drawback right now is that sup is still
> very young, it has its quirks. Never the less it's the best mail
> client I've used so far (used only claws mail before), especially
> when it comes to reading and searching and I don
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 21:01:09 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On 01/20/2010 08:44 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:46:41 +0100
> > Philipp Überbacher wrote:
> >
> >> The only drawback right now is that sup is still
> >> very young,
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:24:22 +0100
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> I didn't understand what you meant first time. I think I got it now.
> If I understand it well you mean having all packages in one directory
> on server and the repos would be differentiated by some text files or
> symlinks. The differe
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:36:50 +0100
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> No, what I meant was that difference between having package pool to
> which packages are linked and sending some text file to all servers
> saying "Hi, please move package foo-1.2.3-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz from
> [testing] to [core]" which wou
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:06:35 -0500
Andrew Antle wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Hannes Rist wrote:
> > Ionut Biru wrote:
> >>
> >> On 02/02/2010 07:53 PM, Damjan Georgievski wrote:
> >
> > There's also the problem that some mirrors (most of the ones
> > I've tried) sync the p
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:27:14 -0500
Lee Burton wrote:
> To make it "multi-tiered" and to reduce load on the primary mirror
> could have slightly more intelligent polling than just checking one
> upstream machine.
> In this example Let:
> Primary = Arch Primary Mirror/Mirrors (updated directly by th
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 20:26:45 +0100 (CET)
Mark Pustjens wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> The attatched patch adds the `-D' option to the sfdisk call.
> This causes some extra space to be saved for the MBR, which is needed
> for grub2 in some cases.
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> Greetings/Groet
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:24:08 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On 02/11/2010 11:54 AM, andrew james wrote:
> > i think I am soon tired of thunderbird 3.. I could revert to vers
> > 2 but why is the newer vers slow, laggy, semi-stallish?
> >
> > has anyone else a funky thunderbird vers 3? any sw
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:16:01 -0500
Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 15:12, Evangelos Foutras
> wrote:
> > For example, in a PKGBUILD I would write ${pkgname}_$pkgver,
> > because _ can be part of a variable name, but I'd much rather
> > prefer to use $pkgname-$pkgver, since hyphens
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:11:01 +0100
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 13.02.2010 21:57, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
> >>> For example, in a PKGBUILD I would write ${pkgname}_$pkgver,
> >>> because _ can be part of a variable name, but I'd much rather
> >>> prefe
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 16:10:08 -0600
Muhammed Uluyol wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> >
> > what do you mean context? it only depends on whether the first
> > character after the variablename is a valid character in a
> > varia
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:18:28 +0100
Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:21 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Just poked around with grub2 and kvm,
> > you really need the extra space, else it will fail to install.
> > creating partitions with cfdisk will also leave this space.
>
>
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:02:53 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:18:28 +0100
> > Jan de Groot wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:21 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> >&
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:26:54 +0100 (CET)
Mark Pustjens wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> The attached patch fixes a TODO in lib-pacman of aif.
> Instead of hardcoding that `core' is always available locally and
> falling back to net for others, it now checks /src/ for repos.
>
> It assumes repos are stored
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:12:10 +0100
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Freitag 05 März 2010 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> > Hi guys, i'm just trying to get grub2 support in archboot's setup.
> >
> > Now i have found an irritating thing it seems it doesn't like xfs
> > and the ususal xfs_freeze hack from
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:08:43 +0100
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Traditionally, LVM is assembled by running "vgchange -ay" manually.
> That has several problems, especially if one of the physical volumes
> is missing when the VG was supposed to be assembled. This has been
> experienced by people who us
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 14:43:34 +0100
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Freitag 05 März 2010 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
> > On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:12:10 +0100
> >
> > Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > > Am Freitag 05 März 2010 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> > > > Hi
Couldn't find any discussion about this,
but what about we maintain our packages in git instead of svn?
pros:
1) git is awesome
2) we don't need abs/rsync anymore. users can just read from git.
3) git network communication is more efficient then rsync (afaik)
4) users can check out older versions
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:18:26 +0800
Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 07/03/2010, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 7. März 2010 12:03:08 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
> >> 2) svn->git migration is not trivial, since tools, the website, ..
> >> will need to be adapted.
&
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:49:01 +0100
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> 1) We want to be able to see which PKGBUILD matches the package in the
> repository. In SVN, we use copy - which is subversion's equivalent to
> branching: By copying, you create a reference and all history of the
> copied file is still t
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 00:49:22 +0800
Ray Rashif wrote:
> It will work, no doubt. But the problem is this:
>
> svn co $url --depth empty # nothing
> cd $dir
> svn up $pkg
>
> ..against this:
>
> git clone $url # everything
> cd $dir
> git config core.sparsecheckout true
> echo $pkg > .git/info/spa
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:51:30 +0100
Stefan Husmann wrote:
> > 4) users can check out older versions of packages easily, with
> > limited storage overhead.
> Do you want to store binary packages in the git repo? Maybe I
> misunderstand you. Checking out older PKGBUILDs would be doable in
> svn als
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:33:16 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> So you want to do a templated installation something like that of
> kickstart availalbe in Fedora, Redhat and CentOS.
>
> It is possible using Arch Installation Framework but it is under
> development and not meant for use in product
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 23:07:07 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:33:16 +0530
> > Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> >
> >> So you want to do a templated installation something like th
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:04:50 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I agree with everyone else that's said it. This comes up often enough
> but no one ever has a good workflow that works. I have seen nothing
> proposed in this thread that is good. The ONLY thing gained is "oh
> neat, it's in git". We lose q
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:04:40 -0300
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> In few days, I will start a new caeer "math professor", I am really
> very happy because it's something I always wanted to study, and
> beyond that, I really like teaching.
> Besides, I work as a teacher in a secondary school in e
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:49:36 +
Damien Churchill wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 10:56, Damien Churchill wrote:
> > On 12 March 2010 10:54, Ionut Biru wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03/12/2010 12:51 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I was just wondering if there are there any up to date
> >>> instructi
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:17:07 +
Damien Churchill wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 12:14, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > you can also build your own iso's using archiso.
> > it's pretty easy, although you need archiso from git and you must
> > let it look in a repository
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:57:46 -0600
Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > you could also try a netinstall cd and enable the testing repository
> > in /tmp/pacman.conf. IIRC aif (the installer) uses pacman with that
> > confi
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 13:54:56 +0100
Nathan Wayde wrote:
> Comparing with the delta (between the original packages) which 5.3MB
> it's not a whole lot while allowing more flexibility(IMHO).
I don't see the point. with binary delta's you get smaller packages
and getting the non-changed files "aga
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:38:34 +0200
f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I wanted to do a new install today, using netinstall
> on an USB stick which has worked at least 5 times
> before, the last time less than two weeks ago.
>
> Things failed in the 'Configure System' phase, seems
> I
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 20:12:15 +0200
Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:57:10 +0200
> schrieb Dieter Plaetinck :
>
> > well, if you use the old 2009.8 images which has the old aif, it
> > will indeed give problems when you install the latest packages
> > (althoug
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 22:21:11 +0200
f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
> I have another question. The next installs will be 3 clones:
> identical HW, same packages and configuration, they will run
> the same SW at the same time (three audio computation servers,
> each taking care of 64 channels). Is there
"release team" currently that means me.
yes, i'm working on new images.
see:
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-releng/2010-March/thread.html
progress is rather slow, but there is not so much work anymore, so
they'll come..
Dieter
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:03:50 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> On 04/13/2010 02:58 PM, Flavio Costa wrote:
> > What about that: for i in $(ls -1 /etc/rc.d); do alias
> > rc-$i="/etc/rc,d/$i"; done
> > That's simple and dynamic, just insert it on your .bashrc ou
> > /etc/bash.bashrc (global)
> >
>
On Sun, 02 May 2010 12:55:19 +0200
Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 02.05.2010 12:37, Allan McRae wrote:
> > On 02/05/10 20:33, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> >> why is it the new iso's never made the download page?
> >
> > Because they were testing builds and never released...
> > Allan
> >
> >
> >
> Come
> in my opinion we need to let AIF/etc. integration mature along with
> the FS itself. this way when BTRFS is marked "stable" the tools will
> be ready as well and it will be a minor transition.
I could not say it better myself.
It always takes a while until the 'experimental' flag is removed in
On Wed, 5 May 2010 18:49:44 -0500
C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> any other ideas besides rollbacks and an original snapshot that btrfs
> could be used for?
IIRC it supports data checksumming.
about the whole snapshot/volume naming thing: do what you think is best.
i cannot advise you because i don
On Fri, 7 May 2010 08:42:39 +0300
Nick Stepa wrote:
> Archlinux have rolling releases. You can use *netinstall*.iso for
> installing new software or just do `pacman -Syu` after install.
updated images are good for support of new hardware, filesystems, ..
Dieter
On Sun, 02 May 2010 17:49:13 +0200
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> This new kernel just exports some additional symbols for aufs2 which
> was updated to a new snapshot. This should hopefully fix some issues
> with the .33 kernel and aufs. Related aufs packages are: aufs2
> 2.6.33_20100425-2 and aufs2-uti
On Sat, 08 May 2010 11:50:27 +0200
Mathieu Pasquet wrote:
> On 07/05/2010 21:53, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> >> > Archlinux have rolling releases. You can use *netinstall*.iso for
> >> > installing new software or just do `pacman -Syu` after install.
>
> I second
new images are done.
version: 2010.05.13
these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release
after testing.
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
how should they be tested?
for every file, that is:
archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso
archlin
On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:04:40 +0300
Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
> 14.05.2010 18:16, Dieter Plaetinck пишет:
> > new images are done.
> > version: 2010.05.13
> >
> > these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release
> > after testing.
> &
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:22:30 +0200
Michael Towers wrote:
> 2010/5/15 Dries De Smet :
> > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005
> > HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect
> > wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but that's solved after updating.
> >
>
> A
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:41:39 +0200
Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:22:30 +0200
> Michael Towers wrote:
>
> > 2010/5/15 Dries De Smet :
> > > archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005
> > > HA, from usb stick, everyth
Okay guys,
props to Thomas for finding out the problem with the initialization of
wireless cards.
I built new images, dated 2010.05.16 (aka "final final images" ;)) in
which this should be fixed, and which also come with updated core
packages, most notably kernel26-2.6.33.4-1
http://build.archl
On Sun, 16 May 2010 23:28:24 +0800
Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> Would like to help testing it out, but my weekend internet (home
> connection) sucks, and by the time I get into the office it may be
> done already. In any case, if that doesn't happen I'll try to get the
> last two things confirmed.
>
> By
On Sun, 16 May 2010 20:12:32 +0200
Karol Babioch wrote:
> On Sunday 16 May 2010 17:17:28 Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> > So right now, these two things are needed:
> > * confirmation that archlinux-2010.05.16-core-x86_64.iso boots fine.
> > * confirmation that wireless cards are
On Mon, 17 May 2010 00:25:24 +0200
Dries De Smet wrote:
> I'm sorry if I caused anyone work over this, but I must have been
> sleepy, I saw the link to the images, downloaded the first netinstall
> I saw & tested it, not realising it was the new image, but the one
> from april :-( .
>
> Feel a b
On Mon, 17 May 2010 23:55:57 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 17.05.2010 23:36, schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
> > On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 05:17:28PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> >
> >> I built new images, dated 2010.05.16 (aka "final final images" ;))
>
1 - 100 of 252 matches
Mail list logo
