Re: [gentoo-security] Welcome to gentoo-security@lists.gentoo.org

you need to send the messages to gentoo-security+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org On 2019-11-04 09:45, sergiotocal...@gmail.com wrote: > Unsubscribe > >> On 4. Nov 2019, at 08:51, Leo Jackson > > wrote: >> >> >> Unsubscribe >> Regards, Leo

Re: [DNSOP] [hrpc] [Doh] Proposal for a side-meeting on services centralization at IETF 104 Prague

>> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later >> expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and >> that pair of pants. >>    ---maf >> ___ >> hrpc mailing list >> h...@irtf.

[dns-privacy] Interesting article on DNS privacy architecture

pares different privacy policies in a way coherent with the mappings of financial privacy agreement considerations developed by Lorrie Cranor et al. best regards, -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1

Re: [Int-area] Feedback on draft-andersdotter-intarea-update-to-rfc6302-00

ards, Amelia > Regards, > S. Moonesamy > > 1. It is in the Internet Area mailing list archive. > 2. > https://go.forrester.com/blogs/ietf-takes-gdpr-influence-a-little-too-far-in-its-draft-standard-for-logging-for-internet-facing-servers/ > -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Con

Re: [dns-privacy] User Perspective

cy >> > > ___ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55 ___ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Re: [Int-area] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-limited-domains-03.txt

On 2018-09-13 03:50, Tom Herbert wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Amelia Andersdotter > wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Thanks Brian for going through all this work, and Tom and Alexandre for >> providing interesting feedback. >> >> In section 3, it

Re: [Int-area] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-limited-domains-03.txt

privacy/security issues discussed in SUIT) that arise when specific limitations on node privacy or security as described RFC6973 or RFC8280 aren't relevant, because no human is technically impacted. best regards, Amelia -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.

Re: [dns-privacy] Call for Adoption: draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op

ber: y...@jabber.isoc.org <mailto:y...@jabber.isoc.org> >  Skype: danyork   http://twitter.com/danyork > > http://www.internetsociety.org/ > > > > ___ > dns-privacy mailing list > dns-privacy@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.

Re: [dns-privacy] New Version Notification for draft-dickinson-dprive-bcp-op-00.txt

ion:00 >>> Title:DNS Privacy Considerations >>> Document date:2018-07-02 >>> Group:Individual Submission >>> Pages:22 >>> URL: >>>     >>> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bortzmeyer-dprive-rfc7626-bis-00.txt >>

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

On 2018-04-27 23:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 27/04/2018 21:15, Amelia Andersdotter wrote: >> On 2018-04-27 04:00, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > ... >> i would have been slightly less annoyed had this not been the case. For >> this reason: >> >>> This is

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

ls? Do you not think they have a valid perspective on crime > attribution? You might not agree with it, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a > point to be made. > It's not a problem /that/, but /how/ and /where/. In the particular case of these logging proposals, also /when/. best,

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

On 2018-04-27 04:00, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 27/04/2018 09:09, Amelia Andersdotter wrote: >> On 2018-04-26 17:41, Dave O'Reilly wrote: >>> As I mentioned yesterday, I think you are misrepresenting the scope of the >>> ECJ judgement. >>> >>&

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

g around lobbying SDOs. -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55 ___ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

ecade on the merits of logging identifiers. It'd be backdoor politicking. best regards, Amelia > daveor > > -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55 __

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

On 2018-04-26 06:29, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 26/04/2018 04:07, Amelia Andersdotter wrote: >> On 2018-04-25 14:42, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: >>> You could have two different objections to the draft: >>> >>> 1. The IETF does not, in gene

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

cessors. We should > keep enough data to verify a suspected data breach, and judge the > impact. If I can not see if 1 profiles was downloaded by the > same IP, or from 1 different IPs (out of 65535), I might not > be able to fulfill some of the other requirements in

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

p logs for 5 years, as >>> some data must be kept that long. >>> >>> The big privacy issue here is more about abuse and losing the data >>> (move them away from the internet facing server within 3 days would be >>> a good recommendation). This must be

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

c. > Easter is an example, Thursday to monday are non-working days. That is > 5 days + the extra. So the 3 days should be 6 days without even > accounting for holidays. > >   > -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6C

Re: [Int-area] draft-andersdotter (was RE: WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

op-out, perhaps, but which hopefully serves to remind server operators to be intentional and clear to subscribers about what they're doing and what the policies are on their server. I would happily take on suggestions for how to improve my draft. best regards, -- Amelia Andersdotter Technica

Re: [Int-area] draft-andersdotter (was RE: WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

On 2018-04-25 00:26, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 24/04/2018 18:08, Amelia Andersdotter wrote: >> Dear Mohamed, >> >> See below: >> >> On 2018-04-24 07:25, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: >>> [Med] I don't have a problem with the general intent

Re: [Int-area] draft-andersdotter (was RE: WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

re things that would be helpful if the IETF weeds out. best regards, A >> http://www.waitrose.com/privacynotice is worth a read, I found. It makes >> IP addresses look very uninteresting. > > True.   However, one can in principle configure the not to send this > sort of inform

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

n't know if > Wikipedia logs this information for law enforcement use, but if they > do, then logging the source port as well _in these situations_ would > make sense, even though logging it when the end user is simply reading > pages would not. > > > > __

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

lia) already pointed out a number of things to talk > about: for example, if you are going to log source ports, it should be > possible to log them only when doing so is necessary, and not log them > at other times.   This is a meaningful technical point that would have > clear impli

Re: [Int-area] draft-andersdotter (was RE: WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

is the primary thing to establish. I'll provide more comments later. best, A -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55 ___ Int-area mailing

Re: [Int-area] draft-andersdotter (was RE: WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

I don't understand the objection. The IETF discusses access control and authentication in various circumstances. If anything, the recommendation could be accused of being too inexact to qualify as a good recommendation. The scope of it is fine and well within IETFs mandate. best regards, Amelia

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

I've tabled a similar draft but with a different scope. Happy to discuss with members on the list: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-andersdotter-intarea-update-to-rfc6302/ -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

On 2018-04-22 22:36, Amelia Andersdotter wrote: > > that have been considered in the IETF. > + since December 2016. Typical. -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294

Re: [Int-area] WG adoption call: Availability of Information in Criminal Investigations Involving Large-Scale IP Address Sharing Technologies

> Int-area mailing list > Int-area@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] 2017-02: what does it achieve?

On 2017-09-25 18:33, Malcolm Hutty wrote: > Yes, I get that it will trigger on that. > > What I'm struggling with (I don't want to speak for Nick), is this: what > is the benefit of getting people to set it to a valid address that no > human reads, or no human capable of acting, over null or the va

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Fwd: [ripe-list] Network security and Brussels

Dear all, I do not wish to add stress or burden on anyone but here are three additional staff working documents from the Commission, which may cast light on some of the proposals they're putting forward (or at least why): http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/AUTO/?uri=SWD:2017:500:FIN http://eu

Re: [anti-abuse-wg] Bringing Law Enforcement Into the RIPE Community

On 2017-08-01 18:19, Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: > On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 03:00:28PM +0100, Brian Nisbet wrote: >> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/richard_leaning/bringing-law-enforcement-into-the-ripe-community >> > > It certainly is "interesting". For instance: > The MoU is aspirational. RIPE NCC may

Re: Fwd: [DFRI-listan] Stefan Svallfors: "Låt Snowden få Sacharovpriset"

Edouard Gaudout i Gröna gruppen har redan jobbat med den frågan i somras om jag minns rätt så man kan fråga honom. On 2013-08-29 16:47, "Christian Engström (pp)" wrote: > Sara, > > Utmärkt idé att nominera Snowden till Sacharovpriset. Tar du reda på > hur vi gör? > > /Christian > > > > On 2013-08-