On 2018-04-27 11:30, Dave O'Reilly wrote: >> This is not reflective of my experience. The details are tedious, but >> RFC6302 in its current form, and even more so in the form proposed by >> Dave, contains language reflective of objections to the law in my >> jurisdiction as propagated by law enforcement officials. The irony of >> that situation does not escape me, but neither does the gravity of the >> risk that the IETF would aggravate the problem. > > Also, what’s the problem with a position being put forward by law enforcement > officials? Do you not think they have a valid perspective on crime > attribution? You might not agree with it, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a > point to be made. >
It's not a problem /that/, but /how/ and /where/. In the particular case of these logging proposals, also /when/. best, -- Amelia Andersdotter Technical Consultant, Digital Programme ARTICLE19 www.article19.org PGP: 3D5D B6CA B852 B988 055A 6A6F FEF1 C294 B4E8 0B55 _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
