[Bug target/98799] [10 Regression] vector_set_var ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98799 luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/98814] New: Add fix-it hints for missing asterisk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98814 Bug ID: 98814 Summary: Add fix-it hints for missing asterisk Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/97787] [10/11 regression] 64bit mips lto: .symtab local symbol at index x (>= sh_info of y)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/98815] New: Redundant free_dominance_info in cgraph_node::analyze()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98815 Bug ID: 98815 Summary: Redundant free_dominance_info in cgraph_node::analyze() Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/93833] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in trans_array_constructor, at fortran/trans-array.c:2566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93833 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:75d3d65641e1724d492816bd380587df486209c0 commit r10-9295-g75d3d65641e1724d492816bd380587df486209c0 Author: Paul Thomas Date

[Bug fortran/93833] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in trans_array_constructor, at fortran/trans-array.c:2566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93833 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6adbc3702edb4b6931731282fe4b2350eba1e0d commit r9-9201-gf6adbc3702edb4b6931731282fe4b2350eba1e0d Author: Paul Thomas Date:

[Bug fortran/93833] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE in trans_array_constructor, at fortran/trans-array.c:2566

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93833 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/98771] [10/11 regression] gcc.dg/strcmpopt_8.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98771 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7a0507ad9f07492a37325a2f494ed933b217a9a commit r11-6885-gb7a0507ad9f07492a37325a2f494ed933b217a9a Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Mo

[Bug testsuite/98771] [10 regression] gcc.dg/strcmpopt_8.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98771 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11 regression] |[10 regression] |gcc.d

[Bug c++/98816] New: The thread_local specifier appear on the declaration of static member function is compilied by gcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98816 Bug ID: 98816 Summary: The thread_local specifier appear on the declaration of static member function is compilied by gcc Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/98817] New: Optimize if (a != b) a = b;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98817 Bug ID: 98817 Summary: Optimize if (a != b) a = b; Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libbacktrace/98818] New: [libbacktrace] Don't throw fatal error for unsupported dwarf version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98818 Bug ID: 98818 Summary: [libbacktrace] Don't throw fatal error for unsupported dwarf version Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/98817] Optimize if (a != b) a = b;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98817 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/98817] Optimize if (a != b) a = b;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98817 --- Comment #2 from Antony Polukhin --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > I'm not sure about this. Turning it into an unconditional store would mean > that the memory the reference points to must be writable, that might not be > alwa

[Bug middle-end/98801] Request for a conditional move built-in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98801 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Severity|normal

[Bug middle-end/98817] Optimize if (a != b) a = b;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98817 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This cannot be done due to race conditions too: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic/GCCMM/DataRaces

[Bug c++/98803] [C++20] ICE on invalid code with checked build [in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:45335]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98803 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug target/98807] [11 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -mno-sse2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98807 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug bootstrap/98809] sem_util.adb:885:30: "T" conflicts with declaration at line 881

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98809 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/98817] Optimize if (a != b) a = b;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98817 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- cmov has the exact same problem as the unconditional store. At least on x86 a cmov for one doesn't have a MEM destination and so the conditionally assigned register then needs to be unconditionally stored. Y

[Bug c++/98810] [C++20] ICE in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:16771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98810 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-25 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug debug/98811] [11 regression] All Go tests FAIL with abbrev offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98811 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug middle-end/98817] Optimize if (a != b) a = b;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98817 --- Comment #5 from Antony Polukhin --- Please, close as invalid

[Bug tree-optimization/98813] loop is sub-optimized if index is unsigned int with offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98813 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||53947 Keywords|

[Bug target/98537] [11 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn since r11-5839

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98537 --- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu --- Created attachment 50045 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50045&action=edit Fix ICE: Don't generate integer mask comparision for 128/256-bits vector when op_true/op_false are NULL or constm1

[Bug middle-end/98817] Optimize if (a != b) a = b;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98817 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libbacktrace/98818] [libbacktrace] Don't throw fatal error for unsupported dwarf version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98818 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/98815] Redundant free_dominance_info in cgraph_node::analyze()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98815 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libbacktrace/98818] [libbacktrace] Don't throw fatal error for unsupported dwarf version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98818 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- DWARF5 is 4 years old in a few days, and if we didn't switch nothing would be fixed in the next year either.

[Bug target/97787] [10/11 regression] 64bit mips lto: .symtab local symbol at index x (>= sh_info of y)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787 --- Comment #21 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #20) > Indeed already the name, .LTHUNK5.lto_priv.0, hints at that this should be a > local symbol. Not sure why we end up with a .reloc then. > > ld $25,%

[Bug c++/98798] Custom operator new[] and delete[] is buggy for aligned class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98798 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-25 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/98807] [11 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -mno-sse2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98807 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Hmm, OK, as I feared. We use TImode (not BLKmode) for vector(2) . I wonder if we can simplify vector_element_bits with the constraints we now have in place for bool vector build. That is, unsigned int ve

[Bug c++/98802] [10/11 Regression] class template argument deduce guide leads infinite recursive since r10-4719-g9b41ebbcdf9e3328

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98802 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/98819] New: -Wall -Wformat-signedness suggests %u for %u

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98819 Bug ID: 98819 Summary: -Wall -Wformat-signedness suggests %u for %u Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/98517] gfortran segfault on character array initialization from parameter value since r8-5900-g266404a8d62b99ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6b0e33febbf73abfcc2bb0e28f0b62afe3b0f2a commit r11-6887-gc6b0e33febbf73abfcc2bb0e28f0b62afe3b0f2a Author: Paul Thomas Date: Mon Ja

[Bug target/97787] [10/11 regression] 64bit mips lto: .symtab local symbol at index x (>= sh_info of y)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787 --- Comment #22 from Richard Biener --- There is target specific sanitizing of symbol names - if the name is really the issue then it should be _much_ more prevalent since all IPA cloning uses dots as well. clone_function_name produces them and

[Bug fortran/98517] gfortran segfault on character array initialization from parameter value since r8-5900-g266404a8d62b99ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:039ac05206397227b68436cd1572ac667820c915 commit r10-9297-g039ac05206397227b68436cd1572ac667820c915 Author: Paul Thomas Date:

[Bug fortran/98517] gfortran segfault on character array initialization from parameter value since r8-5900-g266404a8d62b99ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:504159b44da4adbea75047da0ad06c6d4223caec commit r9-9202-g504159b44da4adbea75047da0ad06c6d4223caec Author: Paul Thomas Date:

[Bug fortran/98517] gfortran segfault on character array initialization from parameter value since r8-5900-g266404a8d62b99ab

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98517 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Resolutio

[Bug c++/98819] Wall Wformat-signedness suggests %u for %u

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98819 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think you misunderstood the diagnostic. It is saying unsigned int is for %u. The type you have is int.

[Bug c++/98819] Wall Wformat-signedness suggests %u for %u

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98819 --- Comment #2 from Jonny Grant --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I think you misunderstood the diagnostic. It is saying unsigned int is for > %u. The type you have is int. Ah, is that "%u" not the suggestion? Change it to %f

[Bug lto/97787] [10/11 regression] 64bit mips lto: .symtab local symbol at index x (>= sh_info of y)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |lto CC|

[Bug c++/98820] New: Placeholder (auto) non-type template parameter wrongly deduced to 'const' for class type arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98820 Bug ID: 98820 Summary: Placeholder (auto) non-type template parameter wrongly deduced to 'const' for class type arguments Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/97683] [11 Regression] nios2 assembler branch offset errors building glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97683 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- Thanks. The -Werror failure you reported is due to PR98512. Martin has posted a patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/564060.html Should I open a binutils bug with the generated .s f

[Bug lto/97787] [10/11 regression] 64bit mips lto: .symtab local symbol at index x (>= sh_info of y)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787 --- Comment #24 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #22) > There is target specific sanitizing of symbol names - if the name is really > the issue then it should be _much_ more prevalent since all IPA cloning uses > dots a

[Bug target/95646] [GCC 9/10] arm-none-eabi function attribute 'cmse_nonsecure_entry' wipes register values with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95646 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|arm-none-eabi function |[GCC 9/10] arm-none-eabi

[Bug c++/98816] The invalid use of a thread_local specifier that appears on the declaration of static member functions can be accepted by GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98816 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/98811] [11 regression] All Go tests FAIL with abbrev offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98811 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug c++/97627] [9/10/11 Regression] loop end condition missing - endless loop with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97627 --- Comment #10 from bin cheng --- hmm, For below basic block: 128 ;; basic block 4, loop depth 2, maybe hot 129 ;;prev block 3, next block 9, flags: (NEW, VISITED) 130 ;;pred: 3 (FALLTHRU,EXECUTABLE) 131 ;;7 (FALL

[Bug lto/97787] [10/11 regression] 64bit mips lto: .symtab local symbol at index x (>= sh_info of y)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97787 --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener --- OK, so it's read as *.LTHUNK5.lto_priv.0/2880 (*.LTHUNK5) @0xfff1163840 Type: function definition analyzed alias Visibility: in_other_partition used_from_other_partition prevailing_def_ironly external

[Bug c++/97627] [9/10/11 Regression] loop end condition missing - endless loop with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97627 --- Comment #11 from bin cheng --- (In reply to bin cheng from comment #10) > hmm, > For below basic block: > 128 ;; basic block 4, loop depth 2, maybe hot > 129 ;;prev block 3, next block 9, flags: (NEW, VISITED) > 130 ;;pred: 3

[Bug c++/97627] [9/10/11 Regression] loop end condition missing - endless loop with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97627 --- Comment #12 from bin cheng --- a. why the loop is considered as infinite b. we need to skip fake exit edges in niter analysis?

[Bug target/98807] [11 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -mno-sse2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98807 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:defc40db9e09ecceb2d71727031fe9579bce1b11 commit r11-6890-gdefc40db9e09ecceb2d71727031fe9579bce1b11 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/98807] [11 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -mno-sse2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98807 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/98739] -fprofile-reproducible is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98739 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5089df534b85b795bfcdca8f4f1957ad15a60558 commit r11-6891-g5089df534b85b795bfcdca8f4f1957ad15a60558 Author: Martin Liska Date: Fri

[Bug gcov-profile/98739] -fprofile-reproducible is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98739 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e05a117dc4b98f3ac60851608f532ba7cee7343a commit r11-6892-ge05a117dc4b98f3ac60851608f532ba7cee7343a Author: Martin Liska Date: Fri

[Bug tree-optimization/98563] [10/11 Regression] vectorization fails while it worked on gcc 9 and earlier since since r10-2271-gd81ab49d0586fca0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98563 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/98821] New: modules : c++tools configures with CC but code fragments assume CXX.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98821 Bug ID: 98821 Summary: modules : c++tools configures with CC but code fragments assume CXX. Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/98811] [11 regression] All Go tests FAIL with abbrev offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98811 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fe5cb7f94d4e9b6fc932017d4ee74ba4f9f417b9 commit r11-6893-gfe5cb7f94d4e9b6fc932017d4ee74ba4f9f417b9 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Mo

[Bug middle-end/98689] [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-return-1.c -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98689 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 CC|rsandifo at sou

[Bug c++/98822] New: Rejects-valid: instantiation of class template instantiates (all) constrained non-template friend definitions (, even those) with unsatisfied constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98822 Bug ID: 98822 Summary: Rejects-valid: instantiation of class template instantiates (all) constrained non-template friend definitions (, even those) with unsatisfied

[Bug c++/98767] Function signature lost in concept diagnostic message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98767 ensadc at mailnesia dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ensadc at mailnesia dot com

[Bug fortran/98490] Unexpected out of bounds in array constructor with implied do loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11 Regression] std::variant default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/97164] [8/9/10 Regression] incorrect offset on structure member where type of that member has aligned attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97164 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[8/9/10/11 Regression] |[8/9/10 Regression] |i

[Bug fortran/98472] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7352

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98472 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98800] [8/9/10/11 Regression] ICE on invalid use of non-static member function in trailing return type since r8-2724

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98800 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-01-25 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug fortran/98472] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:7352

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98472 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/98803] [10/11 Regression] [C++20] ICE on invalid code with checked build [in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:45335]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98803 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[C++20] ICE on invalid code |[10/11 Regression] [C++20]

[Bug go/98823] New: go testsuite and timeouts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98823 Bug ID: 98823 Summary: go testsuite and timeouts Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go Assignee: i

[Bug c++/98463] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5491 by r11-2720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98463 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94ff4c9dd98f39280fba22d1ad0958fb25a5363b commit r11-6895-g94ff4c9dd98f39280fba22d1ad0958fb25a5363b Author: Jason Merrill Date: F

[Bug target/97683] [11 Regression] nios2 assembler branch offset errors building glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97683 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/97683] [11 Regression] nios2 assembler branch offset errors building glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97683 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug tree-optimization/97260] [9/10/11 regression] memcmp of constant string and local constant array not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97260 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug bootstrap/98616] Compile gcc 10.2.0 error for loongson 2f CPU use MIPS n32 ABI on Gentoo OS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98616 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson --- > cat mips64el-unknown-linux-gnu/libgcc/config.log ... configure:3778: checking for suffix of object files configure:3800: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-10.2.0-r5/work/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/var/tmp/portage

[Bug c++/98463] [11 Regression] internal compiler error: in output_constructor_regular_field, at varasm.c:5491 by r11-2720

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98463 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/98824] New: [C++-20] function template non-type-class-arg deduction fails with a reason that looks bogus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98824 Bug ID: 98824 Summary: [C++-20] function template non-type-class-arg deduction fails with a reason that looks bogus Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/95095] Feature request: support -fno-unique-section-names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95095 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- I was under the impression this unique section thing needed the trailing dot thing. This probably is not true. I still think the old "%" thing is much superior to the trailing dot thing, but that then

[Bug c++/97474] [8/9/10/11 Regression] produces wrong code with references to another field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97474 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill --- Yeah, adding restrict there is just wrong; the constructor is called outside the function, and could e.g. stash a pointer to the object in a global variable. What we actually want is to treat this reference

[Bug c/98819] Wall Wformat-signedness suggests %u for %u

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98819 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/98825] New: Unexpected behavior of FORTRAN FORMAT expressions when suppressing new line with '$'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825 Bug ID: 98825 Summary: Unexpected behavior of FORTRAN FORMAT expressions when suppressing new line with '$' Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug ada/98228] [11 Regression] ICE: Assert_Failure atree.adb:931: Error detected at s-gearop.adb:382:34 [a-ngrear.adb:313:7 [a-nllrar.ads:18:1]] on s390x-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98228 --- Comment #18 from Marius Hillenbrand --- The fix looks good -- bootstrap succeeded on s390x, both regular and the 4-stage profiledbootstrap-lean. Still running the test suite...

[Bug c/98819] Wall Wformat-signedness suggests %u for %u

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98819 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/95095] Feature request: support -fno-unique-section-names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95095 --- Comment #7 from Fangrui Song --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #6) > I was under the impression this unique section thing needed the trailing > dot thing. This probably is not true. > > I still think the old "%" thing is much

[Bug libfortran/98825] Unexpected behavior of FORTRAN FORMAT expressions when suppressing new line with '$'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98825 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/98826] New: [gcc vs g++] qualified type of members of anonymous struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98826 Bug ID: 98826 Summary: [gcc vs g++] qualified type of members of anonymous struct Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug go/98823] go testsuite and timeouts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98823 --- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor --- The Go testsuite is intended to have timeouts for all tests. The test gcc/testsuite/go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue19182.go is just passed off to the TCL function go-torture-execute. Running the executable

[Bug c/98826] [gcc vs g++] qualified type of members of anonymous struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98826 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- As I said on the WG14 reflector, I think the natural handling of anonymous structs and unions for C is that anonymity provides only a shorthand for name lookup (member access, designated in

[Bug target/95095] Feature request: support -fno-unique-section-names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95095 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- I say nothing like that. I say that .text.hot. is nasty (is easily mistaken for .text.hot). I also say that and that named-per-function sections are better as .text%name than as .text.name (just

[Bug fortran/97345] FE passes do_subscript leaks gmp memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97345 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org E

[Bug go/98823] go testsuite and timeouts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98823 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- go_load is defined in lib/gcc-dg.exp.

[Bug fortran/97031] the content of a comment line breaks compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97031 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/98801] Request for a conditional move built-in function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98801 Peter Cordes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at cordes dot ca --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug fortran/96843] gfortran rejects as shape mismatch rank one logical array arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96843 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/96386] Internal compiler error in ASSOCIATE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96386 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC|

[Bug go/98823] go testsuite and timeouts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98823 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor --- I'm sure I'm missing something, but what I see in lib/gcc-dg.exp is code that says "if ${tool}_load already exists, then wrap it." I don't see the original implementation of ${tool}_load.

[Bug go/98823] go testsuite and timeouts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98823 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- That's standard part of dejagnu. /usr/share/dejagnu/standard.exp

[Bug fortran/94660] Wrong subroutine called at runtime than the one called in the source code with deferred subroutines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94660 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug c++/98646] [11 Regression] A static_cast confuses -Wnonnull, causing false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98646 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6f1cf644c45b76a27b6a6869dedaa030e3c7570 commit r11-6900-gd6f1cf644c45b76a27b6a6869dedaa030e3c7570 Author: Martin Sebor Date: Mon

[Bug go/98823] go testsuite and timeouts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98823 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab --- And for the unix board, its implementation is in /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp.

  1   2   >