[Bug target/95095] Feature request: support -fno-unique-section-names

[segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95095

--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I say nothing like that.  I say that
  .text.hot.
is nasty (is easily mistaken for .text.hot).

I also say that and that named-per-function sections are better as
  .text%name
than as
  .text.name
(just as they were long ago), because this doesn't conflict with things like
  .text.hot
(and there is a very long history of such conflicts giving real-world
problems).