https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95095
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I was under the impression this unique section thing needed the trailing dot thing. This probably is not true. I still think the old "%" thing is much superior to the trailing dot thing, but that then is orthogonal to the "unique section" thing, so let's ignore it now :-) It still remains that this flag needs a name that says what it *does*, as I mentioned at the end of Comment 4.
