-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote:

>I am not criticizing djbdns (other than for the damned name); I am merely 
>pointing out that beginners are not happy and comfortable with tarballs 
>yet, get less confused when things are done in a consistent way, and have 
>as yet only learned a very limited set of tools. So a package, however 
>good, that disregards all of that is presenting a much harder learning curve.

>For the beginner, learning everything required to run djbdns is harder than 
>it is to get BIND up and running. BIND is installed, configured, and 
>running as part of the OS installation; djbdns has to go through all that. 

Ok ... fair enough, if we agree that you're writing a Red Hat-specific
document!  Perhaps that's where our disconnect was.  My
misunderstanding, perhaps; I haven't read your document yet.)  

In any case, provided the scope is appropriately defined, it'll be 
appreciated.  Thanks again for your work on this.

- -d

- -- 
David Talkington
http://www.spotnet.org

PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iQA/AwUBO+rxLL9BpdPKTBGtEQJq/wCgjUs95vkMf/X14jelGEIBJzGhQ+cAoKVF
4nbTKs/3Xrs8LCR6YXs9r9H1
=FR/c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to