Jan 5, at 15:40, Peter Peltonen sent through the Star Gate:
>Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
>
>> I was using the above with IP masquerading. Eth0 on the Cisco was set to
>> my static IP address, but aliased to 10.0.0.1. I set eth0 on the Linux
>> router to 10.0.0.2 (didn't use pump or dhcp in the Linux box), then set
>> eth1 in the Linux router (computer) to a LAN address as you've shown
>
>So your setup was like this:
>
>
>CISCO
>eth0:1 public address
>eth0:0 10.0.0.1
> |
> |
>eth0 10.0.0.2
>LINUX
>eth1 public address
>eth2 private address
eth1 private address: 192.168.0.
no eth2
>And you could do masquerading? May I ask how? If your Linux box does
>masquerading then all packets would seem to be sent from 10.0.0.1 and that
>wouldn't work or would it?
I'm not real sure about the technicalities of this; but I had to get my ISP to
set up their DNS so that my machine name resolved. I have a static IP address,
so when a lookup was done by my local system, either through mail or otherwise,
my static IP address was used instead of eth0 on the Linux router. This
apparently works for all boxes, because the private network had no trouble
accessing the 'net for http, ftp, telnet, icq, etc.
Glen
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
