Hi everybody,
and thanks for your time that you've put to help me. The problem I'm having
obiviously is that the CISCO router is not aware of the Linux router I've put
there. I've asked my ISP to configure the CISCO router. I've asked them for a
small additional network between the CISCO and the Linux box. If they don't
give that to me then we'll have to do some subnetting, which will be an akward
but not an impossible task.
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> So, let's try again. What about the configuration of the CISCO? Guess you'll
> have to configure this router to add an extra hop to the Linux router. No need
> to contact your ISP over this if they route all your traffic over the CISCO('s
Unfortunately I don't have access to the CISCO box. I told my ISP that I could
configure the CISCO for my needs (if they don't give me the extra network). In
that case I guess all that has to be done with the CISCO is the following:
CISCO
eth0 ip254/m252, static route xxx.xx.xxx.128/m128 gw ip253
|
|
eth0 ip253/m252
LINUX
eth1 routes net128/m192, net192/m240, net208/m240, net224/m240
Because of the network between CISCO and LINUX I "loose" net240/m240 (ip's
241-254).
If someone figures out a better subnetting scheme I'm open to suggestions...
I've been suggested to use a private network between CISCO and LINUX which
would be otherwise ok but I'm planning to add a masqueraded network to LINUX
and if I've undestood correctly in that case I need to have a public ip
address for eth0?
Regards,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
