Hi Peter, > I could specify _two_ ip addresses for eth0. One being private and > talking with the CISCO and another being a public address belonging to the > net128/m128 and doing the masquerading. This wouldn't solve anything, since the Cisco would still have to listen and route private IP addresses plus public addresses. Packets from the private IP won't come far. Try the "stealing" you suggested in the other message. You could assign an extra private IP address to the internal nic of the Linux router (eth1) and do the masquerading from there (instead of from another box as I suggested), but that still leaves the issue of the use of public addresses between the Linux and the Cisco router. Bye, Leonard. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: simple routing proble... Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: simple routing problem Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: simple routing problem Peter Peltonen
- Re: simple routing problem Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: simple routing proble... David Brett
- Re: simple routing proble... Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: simple routing proble... David Brett
- Re: simple routing proble... Peter Peltonen
- Re: simple routing proble... Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: simple routing proble... Peter Peltonen
- Re: simple routing proble... Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: simple routing proble... Glen Lee Edwards
- Re: simple routing proble... Peter Peltonen
- Re: simple routing proble... Glen Lee Edwards
- RE: simple routing problem Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: simple routing problem Peter Peltonen
- Re: simple routing problem Leonard den Ottolander
- Re: simple routing problem Peter Peltonen
- Re: simple routing problem David Brett
- Re: simple routing problem Peter Peltonen
- Re: simple routing problem David Brett