Re: simple routing problem

[Peter Peltonen]

Leonard den Ottolander wrote:

>  If you'ld use a public IP for eth0 on the router the router itself couldn't
> be talking to the outside world, so masquerading would fail. I am not sure if
> plain routing would work, although I think this might work if the Cisco
> supports routing local addresses. They might be designed to prevent this
> though (just an idea).

They might be designed that way... Does anyone know? Because I got an other
idea: I could specify _two_ ip addresses for eth0. One being private and
talking with the CISCO and another being a public address belonging to the
net128/m128 and doing the masquerading. 

Regards,
peter



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list