Re: simple routing problem

[Leonard den Ottolander]

                Hi Peter,

> 'Why don't you just "steal" the net252/m252 from the net192/m128? That way you
> would have only two networks xxx.xx.xxx.128/25 and xxx.xx.xxx.252./30. The
> networks will go to eachother's territory but that shouldn't matter because
> routing happens always using the longest netmask.'

 I don't know about routing using the longest netmask, but this setup might(?) 
work as long as you enter the route to 252/30 in the routing table before the 
route to 128/25. Check it out!

                                        Bye,

                                        Leonard.



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list