Benjamin J. Weiss staggered into view and mumbled: > Not quite. SCO could argue that the employee added the code to linux > without specific, management approval.
However, according to the artical and the definition it presents for "apparent authority" SCO is liable for its own employees' actions. Also, by distributing the kernel source under the GPL *AFTER* filing the lawsuit, they were acknowledging that they approved of this code being in the kernel and therefore are bound by its license terms. Lorenzo Prince happy Red Hat 9 iser NO I WILL NOT BUY A UNIXWARE LICENSE! -- "Besides, I think [Slackware] sounds better than 'Microsoft,' don't you?" (By Patrick Volkerding) -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
