Hi Michael, > > A little like SuSE making people pay for their installer > > (YaST).
> Is it really? I am not so sure, was YAST ever licensed under the GPL? > Even so, the GPL doesn't prevent someone from charging for it, it just > means the Source has to be privided when asked. I think you misunderstand me. Afaik SuSE did not license YaST under the GPL. My point is you can build a product using GPL products and "complete" it by adding extra value which could be software with a restricted license, as SuSE did with YaST. This is what SCO tries to do, but obviously under false pretences (ie it's not clear what IP SCO actually wants to license). I did not mean to stretch the comparision between SuSE and SCO any further than this. I considered making this explicit in my previous mail but thought that wasn't necessary. It obviously is ;). Bye, Leonard. -- How clean is a war when you shoot around nukelar waste? Stop the use of depleted uranium ammo! End all weapons of mass destruction. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
