> Well, I think we will now be able to clear up this SCO thing once and > for all. > > http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/03/07/22/1547203.shtml > > Looks like SCO is responsible for putting its own code into the Linux > kernel, in which case they ARE bound by the terms of the GPL, and are > indeed sublicensing all or part of the kernel illegally.
Not quite. SCO could argue that the employee added the code to linux without specific, management approval. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
