Tom, When you own one, if you ever do, and can do your own tests with it, then I'll find your disappointment credible. Whinging your disappointment about a camera that you haven't even held in your hands, never mind looked at its output, is ridiculous.
You can be disappointed in the opinion of the DPReview tester, if you like, but you can't be disappointed in the camera since you have no first-hand knowledge of it. G On Dec 15, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > YOU Haven't GOT the F*cking Camera and all you can say is negative > things based on what you've managed to scrounge up on the internet. > GIVE IT A REST... You're not qualified to say anything about the > K10D. > >> It's amazing that you're amazed really. Hey this reminds me of >> the title of >> my favorite song... >> >> I forthrightly acknowledged that I do not have a K10D, so what is >> the point >> of your redundant restatement of it? >> >> I am disappointed that a reviewer with far more photogrpahic and >> technical >> knowledge than myself, along with far more capacity to perform at >> least >> pseduo-scientific tests, finds that the camera (at least his >> sample of it) >> is nothing really special compared to the competition in the way >> we were >> lead to believe it would stand out, which was greater dynamic range. >> >>> It's amazing how you can be disappointed with something that you >>> have >>> absolutely no experience using. Are you always disappointed with >>> life? Try the alternatives ... >>> >>>> ... While I don't have the camera in hand, I'm very disappointed >>>> with the >>>> advertising hype regarding both the 22-bit and the PRIME engine. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
