I have to post something here, what makes someone an instant photographic expert by buying a particular camera model or a total photograhic moron if they dont? NOTHING. I am not saying you dont or cant learn more about a particular model by owning or using one but it certainly doesnt mean your not "qualified" to comment on one or not based purely on ownership. Thats ridiculous to even conceive. That would mean you would have to buy every piece of shit out there before you could call it a piece of shit, and smart people dont buy pieces of shit in he first place. A piece of shit is a piece of shit, it doesnt matter if you buy it or not. And if something IS a piece of shit, then there is no point of buying/owning it and not spreading the word of warning to others now is there? I am not referring to the Pentax DSLRS on this, I am just saying that too many people are putting too much emphesis on "ownership" of a particular piece of gear to the point of these type of absurd comments like "not qualified to comment" kind of remarks.... jco
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Sullivan Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 6:21 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K10D review online Tom, YOU Haven't GOT the F*cking Camera and all you can say is negative things based on what you've managed to scrounge up on the internet. GIVE IT A REST... You're not qualified to say anything about the K10D. Regards, Bob S. On 12/15/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's amazing that you're amazed really. Hey this reminds me of the > title of my favorite song... > > I forthrightly acknowledged that I do not have a K10D, so what is the > point of your redundant restatement of it? > > I am disappointed that a reviewer with far more photogrpahic and > technical knowledge than myself, along with far more capacity to > perform at least pseduo-scientific tests, finds that the camera (at > least his sample of it) is nothing really special compared to the > competition in the way we were lead to believe it would stand out, > which was greater dynamic range. > > Tom C. > > > > >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: K10D review online > >Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:56:51 -0800 > > > >It's amazing how you can be disappointed with something that you have > >absolutely no experience using. Are you always disappointed with > >life? Try the alternatives ... > > > >G > > > > > >On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > > > ... While I don't have the camera in hand, I'm very disappointed > > > with the advertising hype regarding both the 22-bit and the PRIME > > > engine. > > > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >[email protected] > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
