On 12/16/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Many of the people on this stinking PDML are not qualified. They have a > narcissistic relationship with the Pentax brand.
Fair call. (Though it doesn't smell that bad :-) > Nor do they actually LOOK at the output they get. That's B.S. I don't put much stock in reviews, I read them to find out the spec's and features. More often than not I skip the comparison samples & conclusions. I use the equipment and after a while I come to some sort of subjective decision. I've spent an obscene amount of time looking at my shots (most narcissistic ;-) from the K10D. So far I'm happy enough. > A good 50% of the photos displayed here are nothing more than stinking > street shots of homeless people or mere snapshots with very little if any > consideration given to composition. That's a big call Tom. And a condescending one too. What's wrong with a well executed snapshot? Must all photo's posted be the epitome of fine art? Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
