Tom, YOU Haven't GOT the F*cking Camera and all you can say is negative things based on what you've managed to scrounge up on the internet. GIVE IT A REST... You're not qualified to say anything about the K10D. Regards, Bob S.
On 12/15/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's amazing that you're amazed really. Hey this reminds me of the title of > my favorite song... > > I forthrightly acknowledged that I do not have a K10D, so what is the point > of your redundant restatement of it? > > I am disappointed that a reviewer with far more photogrpahic and technical > knowledge than myself, along with far more capacity to perform at least > pseduo-scientific tests, finds that the camera (at least his sample of it) > is nothing really special compared to the competition in the way we were > lead to believe it would stand out, which was greater dynamic range. > > Tom C. > > > > >From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> > >Subject: Re: K10D review online > >Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:56:51 -0800 > > > >It's amazing how you can be disappointed with something that you have > >absolutely no experience using. Are you always disappointed with > >life? Try the alternatives ... > > > >G > > > > > >On Dec 15, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Tom C wrote: > > > > > ... While I don't have the camera in hand, I'm very disappointed > > > with the > > > advertising hype regarding both the 22-bit and the PRIME engine. > > > > > >-- > >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > >[email protected] > >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
