On 27/11/06, John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Many? I wonder how photographers survived all those years with 25 ASA > Kodachrome and 160 ASA Ektachrome. Poor suckers presumably didn't know > that what they really needed was 1600 ISO. Of course, they produced crap > pictures, as we all know.
I don't really understand your arguments. Do you mean to say that back in the days that 25 ASA Kodachrome was prevalent if reasonable performance ISO 1600 films were available then photographers wouldn't have used them? Crap pictures have been produced since the age of cave drawings and will continue to be produced regardless of effective ISO. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
