On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 22:38:26 -0000, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26/11/06, John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> DPReview is the Domain of Pixel-peepers. How many people are reporting >> these problems? How many know what they are talking about? How many >> actually need 1600 ISO, given that the camera has shake-reduction >> built-in. >> >> I haven't yet got my K10D, but I suspect this is all a load of rubbish >> from the usual suspects. > > It sure is John, and maybe you should have a little think about why SR > can't compensate for lost sensitivity in many shooting situations. :-/ Many? I wonder how photographers survived all those years with 25 ASA Kodachrome and 160 ASA Ektachrome. Poor suckers presumably didn't know that what they really needed was 1600 ISO. Of course, they produced crap pictures, as we all know. John -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
