On 27/11/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My results are preliminary, but after about 400 exposures with the > K10D, I'm quite sure that I can get better results in low light with > this camera than I can with the *istD. It's a combination of SR and > very good high ISO performance. I think you'll feel the same way once > you try it.
Often for me it's not a case of absolute IQ when shooting high ISO but more the need to attain the highest shutter speeds that I can. If the shooting situation provides me with the scope to reduce ISO and stop down a little I'll do it and if SR buys me another couple of stops I can definitely see it being an advantage. But ultimately I'd guess that the K100D would still be a superior low light camera to the K10D even factoring in the suggested advantage of the K10Ds 22bit ADC. -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
