On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 08:28:50AM +0000, Yotam Gigi wrote: ...
> John, as a result of your question I realized that our hardware does do > randomized sampling that I was not aware of. I will use the extensibility of > the API and implement a random keyword, that will be offloaded in our > hardware. Those changes will be sent on v2. > > Eventually, your question was very relevant :) Thanks! Perhaps I am missing the point but why not just make random the default and implement the inverse as an extension if it turns out to be needed in future?
