From: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 06:52:31 -0800
> On 16-11-11 04:43 AM, Simon Horman wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 08:28:50AM +0000, Yotam Gigi wrote: >> >> ... >> >>> John, as a result of your question I realized that our hardware does do >>> randomized sampling that I was not aware of. I will use the extensibility of >>> the API and implement a random keyword, that will be offloaded in our >>> hardware. Those changes will be sent on v2. >>> >>> Eventually, your question was very relevant :) Thanks! >> >> Perhaps I am missing the point but why not just make random the default and >> implement the inverse as an extension if it turns out to be needed in >> future? >> > > +1 just implement the random one. Agreed.
