On 16-11-11 04:43 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 08:28:50AM +0000, Yotam Gigi wrote: > > ... > >> John, as a result of your question I realized that our hardware does do >> randomized sampling that I was not aware of. I will use the extensibility of >> the API and implement a random keyword, that will be offloaded in our >> hardware. Those changes will be sent on v2. >> >> Eventually, your question was very relevant :) Thanks! > > Perhaps I am missing the point but why not just make random the default and > implement the inverse as an extension if it turns out to be needed in > future? >
+1 just implement the random one. .John
