On 12/16/11 11:09 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 12/16/11 9:09 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> On 12/16/11 1:23 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> In a non-anonymous room, the 'from' attribute of a discussion history
>>>>> message SHOULD be the full JID of the original sender. In a
>>>>> semi-anonymous room, the 'from' attribute MUST be set to the JID of the
>>>>> room itself.
>>>>
>>>> I think we have discussed (and I think had consensus) that the from
>>>> should be stamped with the entity doing the delay stamping, and that
>>>> we should add an element to the stanza to tell you who the originator
>>>> was (where anonymity permits).
>>>>
>>>> In the unlikely event that I dreamed this, I propose the above.
>>>
>>> Yes, I recall discussion about that, too. Let me check the interim
>>> version of XEP-0045 to confirm.
>>
>> Changed in my working copy to:
>>
>> Discussion history messages MUST be stamped with Delayed Delivery
>> [14] information qualified by the 'urn:xmpp:delay' namespace to
>> indicate that they are sent with delayed delivery and to specify the
>> times at which they were originally sent. The 'from' attribute MUST
>> be set to the JID of the room itself.
>
> Great, thanks.
>
> Do we want to add another element giving the original JID?
Not needed, methinks. The XML looks like this:
<message
from='[email protected]/firstwitch'
id='162BEBB1-F6DB-4D9A-9BD8-CFDCC801A0B2'
to='[email protected]/broom'
type='groupchat'>
<body>Thrice the brinded cat hath mew'd.</body>
<delay xmlns='urn:xmpp:delay'
from='[email protected]'
stamp='2002-10-13T23:58:37Z'/>
</message>
Do you mean the original real JID, not occupant JID?
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
