On 12/16/11 9:09 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 12/16/11 1:23 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> In a non-anonymous room, the 'from' attribute of a discussion history >>> message SHOULD be the full JID of the original sender. In a >>> semi-anonymous room, the 'from' attribute MUST be set to the JID of the >>> room itself. >> >> I think we have discussed (and I think had consensus) that the from >> should be stamped with the entity doing the delay stamping, and that >> we should add an element to the stanza to tell you who the originator >> was (where anonymity permits). >> >> In the unlikely event that I dreamed this, I propose the above. > > Yes, I recall discussion about that, too. Let me check the interim > version of XEP-0045 to confirm.
Changed in my working copy to: Discussion history messages MUST be stamped with Delayed Delivery [14] information qualified by the 'urn:xmpp:delay' namespace to indicate that they are sent with delayed delivery and to specify the times at which they were originally sent. The 'from' attribute MUST be set to the JID of the room itself. /psa
