On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/16/11 9:09 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> On 12/16/11 1:23 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> In a non-anonymous room, the 'from' attribute of a discussion history >>>> message SHOULD be the full JID of the original sender. In a >>>> semi-anonymous room, the 'from' attribute MUST be set to the JID of the >>>> room itself. >>> >>> I think we have discussed (and I think had consensus) that the from >>> should be stamped with the entity doing the delay stamping, and that >>> we should add an element to the stanza to tell you who the originator >>> was (where anonymity permits). >>> >>> In the unlikely event that I dreamed this, I propose the above. >> >> Yes, I recall discussion about that, too. Let me check the interim >> version of XEP-0045 to confirm. > > Changed in my working copy to: > > Discussion history messages MUST be stamped with Delayed Delivery > [14] information qualified by the 'urn:xmpp:delay' namespace to > indicate that they are sent with delayed delivery and to specify the > times at which they were originally sent. The 'from' attribute MUST > be set to the JID of the room itself.
Great, thanks. Do we want to add another element giving the original JID? /K
