On 12/16/11 1:23 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: >> In a non-anonymous room, the 'from' attribute of a discussion history >> message SHOULD be the full JID of the original sender. In a >> semi-anonymous room, the 'from' attribute MUST be set to the JID of the >> room itself. > > I think we have discussed (and I think had consensus) that the from > should be stamped with the entity doing the delay stamping, and that > we should add an element to the stanza to tell you who the originator > was (where anonymity permits). > > In the unlikely event that I dreamed this, I propose the above.
Yes, I recall discussion about that, too. Let me check the interim version of XEP-0045 to confirm. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
