re
the source is freely available and that along w/ cvs
logs shall give you answers to most of your questions
cu
Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Sascha Retzki:
> Hello folks,
>
> 1.) Do you plan to distribute several MTAs, like NetBSD currently does? Or
> do you already (first check said no, but maybe I missed something)?
>
> 2.) Do you plan to distribute PAM in base?
>
> 3.) Did anybody look close enough on TenDRA yet? I'd like to know how much
> GNUism is in OpenBSDs base, building mechanism, so basicly it adds up to:
> How long do we/you have to wait till TenDRA can be used?
>
> 3.2.) Even if the compiler/debugger/linker stuff runs on BSDLed code from
> the TenDRA people, do you roughly know how much software in base is GPL/GNU,
> and how much of that must be there?
>
> 4.) I saw lkm-stuff in your tree, do you want the same situation as linux has,
> like that "too much" is modulized, or do you want that API for situations
> where kernel mods are the only bearable solution?
>
> 5.) What do you think about devfs? Will it be there in the near or far
> future?
>
> 6.) Do you guys like X11R6? Would you remove it if $somebody comes up with
> some basic window-manager-alike basing on something simple like svgalibs?
> Or, rather, would you distribute that in base, too?
>
>
> I hope I did not forget too much, thanks for reading and possibly
> asking me stuff or answering
>
>
> Sascha Retzki
>
--
paranoic mickey (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
