* Sascha Retzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-05-09 17:22]: > 1.) Do you plan to distribute several MTAs, like NetBSD currently does?
hah. besides that beeing stupid, let's see what options we have... -qmail: unfree -postfix: unfree -exim: dunno license currently, but awkward 80s design, poor implementation, just plain sucks -sendmail: at least free enough to stick it in gnu/ > 2.) Do you plan to distribute PAM in base? no way. > 3.) Did anybody look close enough on TenDRA yet? I'd like to know how much > GNUism is in OpenBSDs base, building mechanism, so basicly it adds up to: > How long do we/you have to wait till TenDRA can be used? tell me when tendra can compile hello world apps on all our archs... I am getting quite bored by that. all balony. I don't see viable alternatives to gcc in the near future, unfortunately. that said, we try to avoid gccisms. > 3.2.) Even if the compiler/debugger/linker stuff runs on BSDLed code from > the TenDRA people, do you roughly know how much software in base is GPL/GNU, > and how much of that must be there? go check out src/gnu/ yourself > 4.) I saw lkm-stuff in your tree, do you want the same situation as linux has, > like that "too much" is modulized, or do you want that API for situations > where kernel mods are the only bearable solution? there is no intent to ship any lkms by default. > 6.) Do you guys like X11R6? Would you remove it if $somebody comes up with > some basic window-manager-alike basing on something simple like svgalibs? oh yeah let's deny our users access to almost all graphical apps! that does not make sense.
