Hi,
For 180d (1/2y)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&f1=days_elapsed&list_id=481820&o1=greaterthan&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&v1=180
[162 bugs]
And for 365d (1y)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&f1=days_elapsed&list_id=481820&o1=greaterthan&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&v1=365
[2 bugs]
Am 18.10.2014 um 08:58 schrieb Tommy:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 05:22:56 +0200, Joel Madero
<[email protected]> wrote:
Okay - if you want I'll run this with my normal needinfo cleanup on the
first of the month. How's that sound?
Best,
Joel
sounds nice. I suggest to wait a few days more for the release of LibO
4.3.3 (Week 44 , Oct 27, 2014 - Nov 2, 2014) in order to have the
latest Fresh release available for testing.
I'm just curious to know what would be the actual numbers of
UNCONFIRMED and NEW bugs with last comment older than 6 months and 1
year.
can you obtain those numbers to have a simulation of what would be the
corrispondent mail traffic that we are going to generate? can you do
that with your Bugzilla admin "powers" ?
once we have those numbers we may decide wheter to run the "please
retest ping campaign" against 6 months old bugs or just 1 year old bugs.
as said before, the first real test has to be done on UNCONFIRMED
bugs, maybe we can already ping 6 months old bugs which should not be
that many (exact numbers needed though)
also give a look at my mockup automated message and tell me if look
good in english:
...............................................................................
Dear users, this bug report has shown no new comments in the last 6
months.
or
Dear users, this bug report has shown no new comments in the last 12
months.
Newer LibO releases with hundred of bugifixes and new features have
been releases meanwhile, so please retest with latest LibO release
(4.3.3.2) and give feedback of the actual status of the bug.
If the bug is not reproducible anymore, please post a comment and set
status to RESOLVED WORKSFORME.
If the bug is still present leave status UNCHANGED and post a new
comment telling the LibO version and O/S where you retested.
Regardless of what you find in newer versions, the VERSION fields
should stay at the _first_ version that showed the buggy behaviour, so
please do not change that value to a later version.
...............................................................................
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
--
Liebe Grüße, / Yours,
Florian Reisinger
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
