Hello. I believe that it is a good idea to check old bugs. 2014-10-16 23:00 GMT+04:00 bfoman <[email protected]>: > Tommy wrote
> If they see the bug has gone they should mark as WORKSFORME > if bug persist they should drop a note and leave status UNCHANGED > if nobody answers we do nothing and leave status UNCHANGED I think we should have an easy way to distinguish the second and the third situation. Not only bugreporters but QA-team members and other people would want to recheck old bugs. It could be a good task for new contributors, because it would help to find duplicates in future. Today, if I want to recheck some old bugs, I can sort bugs by time of changing. Auto messages will break this possibility. Best regards, Alexandr _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
