On 10/17/2014 11:16 AM, Aleksandr P wrote: > Hello. > I believe that it is a good idea to check old bugs. > > 2014-10-16 23:00 GMT+04:00 bfoman <[email protected]>: >> Tommy wrote >> If they see the bug has gone they should mark as WORKSFORME >> if bug persist they should drop a note and leave status UNCHANGED >> if nobody answers we do nothing and leave status UNCHANGED > I think we should have an easy way to distinguish the second and the > third situation. Not only bugreporters but QA-team members and other > people would want to recheck old bugs. It could be a good task for new > contributors, because it would help to find duplicates in future. > Today, if I want to recheck some old bugs, I can sort bugs by time of > changing. Auto messages will break this possibility.
Really good point, but not sure if there's a solution :-/ It might come down to "what is worse" or "what helps us more" Best, Joel > > Best regards, > Alexandr > _______________________________________________ > List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list > Mail address: [email protected] > Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
