On 10/22/2014 09:58 PM, Tommy wrote: > On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:47 +0200, Robinson Tryon > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Tommy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> For 900 (2y 6m) --> 81 bugs >>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&f1=days_elapsed&limit=0&list_id=481870&o1=greaterthan&order=bug_id%20DESC&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&v1=900 >>> >>> >>> so a ping retest mail campaign could be at the moment tested just >>> with the >>> older subsets (730d or 900d) to not generate an excessive spam. >> >> Running the oldest set of 81 bugs would be an interesting test, just >> to see what percentage of bug reporters return to add a comment to the >> bug. >> ... > > I'm pretty sure that there's tons of old NEW bugs that have turned > into WORKSFORME bugs during LibO development... take a look at this > list: http://snipurl.com/29d9hu5 > > these are 24 old bugs that user Beluga (I think's he's one of the new > faces in QA) retested last week and now are gone. > > I wonder how many of those exist in the 7K list of the NEW bugs. I actually ran some tests and pinged users in this category - terribly low response rate :-/
Best, Joel P.S. You can query the qa-admin account for comments and see the bugs that I touch with that account to get an idea. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
