On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 07:18:47 +0200, Robinson Tryon
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Tommy <[email protected]> wrote:
For 900 (2y 6m) --> 81 bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&f1=days_elapsed&limit=0&list_id=481870&o1=greaterthan&order=bug_id%20DESC&product=LibreOffice&query_format=advanced&v1=900
so a ping retest mail campaign could be at the moment tested just with
the
older subsets (730d or 900d) to not generate an excessive spam.
Running the oldest set of 81 bugs would be an interesting test, just
to see what percentage of bug reporters return to add a comment to the
bug.
...
I'm pretty sure that there's tons of old NEW bugs that have turned into
WORKSFORME bugs during LibO development... take a look at this list:
http://snipurl.com/29d9hu5
these are 24 old bugs that user Beluga (I think's he's one of the new
faces in QA) retested last week and now are gone.
I wonder how many of those exist in the 7K list of the NEW bugs.
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
