https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481069
--- Comment #53 from Andreas Schneider <a...@cryptomilk.org> --- (In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #47) > > Idk how this works. > > In KDE, any contributor can raise concern about any part of the code. David > rightfully wrote that the notification server is the correct place to > execute external applications, instead of the client process that issued the > notification. No other contributor objected, so it is perfectly OK that > David rejected the patch in the current form. If someone spends time to implement something and it is the wrong place, shouldn't you explain where it should be implemented and why and give some pointers instead of closing it without comment? This how you drive contributors *away*. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
