https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481069
--- Comment #54 from Andreas Schneider <a...@cryptomilk.org> --- (In reply to Andreas Schneider from comment #53) > (In reply to Christoph Feck from comment #47) > > > Idk how this works. > > > > In KDE, any contributor can raise concern about any part of the code. David > > rightfully wrote that the notification server is the correct place to > > execute external applications, instead of the client process that issued the > > notification. No other contributor objected, so it is perfectly OK that > > David rejected the patch in the current form. > > If someone spends time to implement something and it is the wrong place, > shouldn't you explain where it should be implemented and why and give some > pointers instead of closing it without comment? > > This how you drive contributors *away*. a) What is the notification server? b) Where is the source code of the notification server? c) Why is "Play a sound" not implemented in the notification server? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
