rmannibucau commented on code in PR #1378: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/1378#discussion_r1460650738
########## api/maven-api-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/api/PathType.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY + * KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the + * specific language governing permissions and limitations + * under the License. + */ +package org.apache.maven.api; + +import java.nio.file.Path; +import java.util.Objects; +import java.util.Optional; + +import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Experimental; +import org.apache.maven.api.annotations.Nonnull; + +/** + * The option of a command-line tool where to place the paths to some dependencies. + * A {@code PathType} can identify the Java class-path, the Java module-path, + * or another kind of path for another programming language for example. + * This class is like an enumeration, except that it is extensible: + * plugins can define their own kinds of path. + * + * <p>Path types are often exclusive. For example, a dependency should not be both + * on the Java class-path and on the Java module-path.</p> + * + * @see DependencyProperties#PATH_TYPES + * @see org.apache.maven.api.services.DependencyResolverResult#getDispatchedPaths() + * + * @since 4.0.0 + */ +@Experimental +public abstract class PathType { Review Comment: > So this is non-arbitrary from a Java standard point of view. well, with examples I gave it is, you target a few java standalone tools - agree it is the most used in builds but it is not a reason IMHO and stays bad to link core to spceific plugins so much (we already suffer from that). > I suppose that they could be added to this enumeration as well So what you propose is to include compiler, javadoc, jlink, jpackage etc into maven core and drop plugins (I know it is not what you wrote but it is what it means otherwise the enum is not correct as explained before). > The PathType.option() method could indeed be controversial. It is well understood but here again linked to specific tools to in maven it belongs to plugins or their transitive deps ("shared" module), not to core which is just a plugin orchestrator from a design standpoint, less we have there better we'll be IMHO. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
