kaivalnp commented on PR #15341: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/15341#issuecomment-3412503394
Also noting that for byte vectors, I saw no impact of padding: ``` Benchmark (padBytes) (size) Mode Cnt Score Error Units VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 0 256 thrpt 15 20.453 ± 0.171 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 1 256 thrpt 15 20.651 ± 0.177 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 2 256 thrpt 15 20.601 ± 0.150 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 4 256 thrpt 15 20.602 ± 0.163 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 6 256 thrpt 15 20.677 ± 0.252 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 8 256 thrpt 15 20.395 ± 0.154 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 16 256 thrpt 15 20.368 ± 0.122 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 20 256 thrpt 15 20.364 ± 0.089 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 32 256 thrpt 15 20.337 ± 0.041 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 50 256 thrpt 15 20.617 ± 0.139 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 64 256 thrpt 15 20.557 ± 0.272 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 100 256 thrpt 15 20.770 ± 0.233 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 128 256 thrpt 15 20.487 ± 0.151 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 255 256 thrpt 15 20.419 ± 0.118 ops/us VectorScorerBenchmark.binaryDotProductMemSeg 256 256 thrpt 15 20.644 ± 0.390 ops/us ``` ..so I'm not changing its alignment in this PR -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
