benwtrent commented on PR #14131:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/14131#issuecomment-2615923918

   @dweiss While I think that might work for unused/snapshot Lucene releases, I 
think @chatman et. al. is aiming for usage in the current Lucene Main so that 
Lucene focused search engines (e.g. OpenSearch, Elasticsearch, etc.) can take 
advantage of the cuvs format if they want.
   
   @chatman the only way to get this to work in current major releases (e.g. 
this year) for Apache Lucene engines is to handle this Java version code and 
use the MR-Jar module stuff. Meaning, it cannot have a hard compilation 
dependency on java 22.
   
   > I'd like to bite into the apple and make Java 22 minimum requirement. Then 
we can use Memory segments in our public API and clean up a lot.
   
   You mean bump the minimum Java for every Java release until the next LTS, 
assuming that Lucene 11 will require Java 25? I would be for this myself :). 
Releasing Lucene 11 with Java 25 will have many nice benefits.
   
   But, I think there is a strong desire for @chatman and company to get this 
into production without waiting another year+.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to