slow-J commented on PR #12837:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/12837#issuecomment-1834349738

   > @slow-J How would you like to handle the back port of this? We'll need to 
mark the public methods as deprecated on a 9.x release before we remove them on 
main. Normally, I'd just open a separate PR against 9x that marks deprecation 
and then remove them on main, but I'm not sure what we should do with some 
conversation starting about a 10.0 release. If we don't release a 9.10, then I 
_think_ we'll actually need to mark these public methods as deprecated in the 
10.0 release and wait until an 11.0 release to actually remove them.
   
   Good question @gsmiller 
   
   It looks like it is too late for 9.9.
   Since there is no 10_x branch yet, should I still open a deprecation PR 
against 9_x and add 9.10 changes to the .txt? I assume that a few other people 
may be in the same situation so maybe we could hold the discussion around 
either having a 9.10 version there?
   Otherwise I can repurpose this PR to target 11.0.
   
   
   It’s not a major change but it would be a shame to wait for 11.0 to remove 
the code. :D
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to