[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16938870#comment-16938870
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-13661:
---------------------------------------------
bq. We went through deployment lifecycles of at least 3 of my clients, went
through state of the art package management systems like apt, dnf etc. and
thought through all potential usecases and future of Solr as a lean core with
all non-essential features stripped out as packages in an Apache repository),
as well as went through your talk+code+presentation+document. Our main focus is
ease of use and a robust plugin lifecycle management experience. Your PoC was
lacking some major pieces that we've covered meticulously here: security,
efficient loading (without needing to restart nodes as in your PoC), ease of
deployment, not requiring packages to depend on PF4J (your PoC forced users to
add PF4J as a dependency, perhaps to facilitate the loading) etc.
Also, went through some bits of the user experience of ES plugin system.
[~jpountz], [~jim.ferenczi], [~mikemccand], would love your thoughts on this,
based on your experience with ES.
> A package management system for Solr
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-13661
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13661
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Priority: Major
> Labels: package
> Attachments: plugin-usage.png, repos.png
>
> Time Spent: 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Here's the design doc:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/15b3m3i3NFDKbhkhX_BN0MgvPGZaBj34TKNF2-UNC3U8/edit?usp=sharing
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
