[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13661?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16941012#comment-16941012
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-13661:
---------------------------------------------
bq. I want to be clear on one thing: The concern/frustration that Jan and I
have on peer review is because this issue is not some ordinary JIRA issue. It's
highly impactful to Solr. As-such, IMO peer review is required for at least the
major ideas / high level, naming, CLI, release-plan. Getting into some small
details, no, not needed. Thankfully the peer review is here now
Thanks David and Jan for your help with reviews. I am glad to receive the
reviews and the improvement that brings to our design and implementation. I
shall update the design document with all the details that we discussed offline
(on slack) that will make it easier to understand the workflows involved here.
> A package management system for Solr
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-13661
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13661
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Priority: Major
> Labels: package
> Attachments: plugin-usage.png, repos.png
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Here's the design doc:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/15b3m3i3NFDKbhkhX_BN0MgvPGZaBj34TKNF2-UNC3U8/edit?usp=sharing
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
