Hello Ingo, hello alls,
Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> wrote: > >>> +.ie \\$1 .tr aAbBcCdDeEfFgGhHiIjJkKlLmMnNoOpPqQrRsStTuUvVwWxXyYzZ > >>> +.el .tr aabbccddeeffgghhiijjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz > > >> The problem with this, is that it ignores all but english languages. > > > Yup. I'm aware of that, which is why I did not propose it as an > > actual patch. > I'm a native German speaker and i wouldn't worry about that at all. > It would be good enough to just ignore that problem, it is really a > fringe case. While I agree with the facts that 1) translated manpages are rarely up to date, 2) most people, and particularly those having to read manual pages, speak english well enough for that task, and 3) computer science is better understood in english than in native languages in most places, I can't agree on the fact that a typographical enhancement of manual pages should involve a regression for all languages but english. I mean, people allready believe that groff/troff is a tool of the past, they don't need to come back to the nineties when computers were unable to display accented uppercase letters. Or should they ? Kind regards, Pierre-Jean.
