> >> That's what I call "ignoring the rest". You do not communicate, > >> you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff. > > > > That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able > > to address. You should raise this issue with them rather than > > accusing each other on the lists. > > I completely agree with this. I feel that this thread is a sign that > there is a problem on how the new QA communicates problems with the > developers that cause them. I read the entire thread and I still don't > think there is an agreement on who broke the tree and why. Would a > private discussion be better before going publicly with accusations?
Introducing repoman warnings deliberately is wrong. Point. QA can do trivial fixes. Point. None of these two points needs any discussion. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) dilfri...@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
